Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 21;12(12):2651.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122651.

Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study

Yusra Al-Lahham et al. Biomedicines. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Glycated albumin (GA) serves as a biomarker for short-term glycemic control (2-3 weeks), playing a role in diabetes management. Our goal was to establish reference intervals (RIs) for serum GA, and the ratios of 1,5-anhydroglucitol to GA (AGI) and GA to HbA1c in a Euro-Brazilian pediatric population (10 y, n = 299), adults (43.5 y; n = 290), and pregnant women (26 y, n = 406; 26.5 ± 3.1 gestation weeks). Methods: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to determine RIs for type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children (n = 148) and adults (n = 81), type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 283), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, n = 177). Results: Both non-pregnant and pregnant women exhibited GA RIs of 10.0-13.3% and 10.6-14.7%, respectively. The AGI ratio varied from 1.2-4.3 in children, 0.9-3.6 in adults, and 0.8-3.1 in pregnant women. Meanwhile, the GA/HbA1c ratio ranged from 1.8-2.6 in children and adults to 2.3-3.6 in pregnant women. GA and AGI ratios accurately differentiated between T1D and T2D, demonstrating high sensitivity (>84%) and specificity (>97%), with AGI showing superior performance (AUC > 0.99). The GA/HbA1c ratio exhibited moderate discriminatory power (AUC > 0.733) but was less effective in distinguishing adult-onset T1D and T2D, suggesting its limited utility in certain groups. Conclusions: The proposed RIs are consistent with those of other Caucasian populations, affirming their relevance for Euro-Brazilian patients. The GA and AGI ratios emerge as valuable diagnostic tools for T1D and T2D, though their reduced sensitivity in diagnosing GDM warrants further investigation. Clinicians might leverage GA and AGI ratios for more tailored diabetes management, especially when HbA1c results are not optimal.

Keywords: 1,5-anhydroglucitol; diabetes; glycated albumin; glycated hemoglobin; glycemic biomarkers; glycemic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reference interval for glycated albumin during pregnancy related to the weeks of gestation. The dotted line represents the median and solid lines represent the 0.25 and 0.975 percentiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curve for glycated albumin and different types of diabetes. (A) T1D: type 1 diabetes (<14 years), (B) T1D: type 1 diabetes (37–53 years), (C) T2D: type 2 diabetes (41–66 years), and (D) pregnant women (24–35 years). AUC: area under curve; criterion: cut-off value.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparisons of glycated albumin between healthy patients and different types of diabetes. The values are mean ± standard deviation, the sample size for each group is described in Materials and Methods. CTRL: control; T1D: type 1 diabetes; T2D: type 2 diabetes; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus. The dotted lines represent the proposed reference interval for children and adults combined (10.0–13.8%), p: probability using the two-tailed Student’s t-test.

References

    1. IDF IDF DIABETES ATLAS. [(accessed on 5 January 2021)]. Available online: www.diabetesatlas.org.
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl. J. Med. 1993;329:977–986. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Kidney Int. 1995;47:1703–1720. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.236. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995;44:968–983. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.8.968. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. ElSayed N.A., Aleppo G., Bannuru R.R., Bruemmer D., Collins B.S., Ekhlaspour L., Gaglia J.L., Hilliard M.E., Johnson E.L., et al. 3. Prevention or Delay of Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47:S43–S51. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources