Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 39767558
- PMCID: PMC11673511
- DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122651
Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study
Erratum in
-
Correction: Al-Lahham et al. Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2651.Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 2;13(7):1621. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071621. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40679499 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Glycated albumin (GA) serves as a biomarker for short-term glycemic control (2-3 weeks), playing a role in diabetes management. Our goal was to establish reference intervals (RIs) for serum GA, and the ratios of 1,5-anhydroglucitol to GA (AGI) and GA to HbA1c in a Euro-Brazilian pediatric population (10 y, n = 299), adults (43.5 y; n = 290), and pregnant women (26 y, n = 406; 26.5 ± 3.1 gestation weeks). Methods: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to determine RIs for type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children (n = 148) and adults (n = 81), type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 283), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, n = 177). Results: Both non-pregnant and pregnant women exhibited GA RIs of 10.0-13.3% and 10.6-14.7%, respectively. The AGI ratio varied from 1.2-4.3 in children, 0.9-3.6 in adults, and 0.8-3.1 in pregnant women. Meanwhile, the GA/HbA1c ratio ranged from 1.8-2.6 in children and adults to 2.3-3.6 in pregnant women. GA and AGI ratios accurately differentiated between T1D and T2D, demonstrating high sensitivity (>84%) and specificity (>97%), with AGI showing superior performance (AUC > 0.99). The GA/HbA1c ratio exhibited moderate discriminatory power (AUC > 0.733) but was less effective in distinguishing adult-onset T1D and T2D, suggesting its limited utility in certain groups. Conclusions: The proposed RIs are consistent with those of other Caucasian populations, affirming their relevance for Euro-Brazilian patients. The GA and AGI ratios emerge as valuable diagnostic tools for T1D and T2D, though their reduced sensitivity in diagnosing GDM warrants further investigation. Clinicians might leverage GA and AGI ratios for more tailored diabetes management, especially when HbA1c results are not optimal.
Keywords: 1,5-anhydroglucitol; diabetes; glycated albumin; glycated hemoglobin; glycemic biomarkers; glycemic control.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- IDF IDF DIABETES ATLAS. [(accessed on 5 January 2021)]. Available online: www.diabetesatlas.org.
-
- American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. ElSayed N.A., Aleppo G., Bannuru R.R., Bruemmer D., Collins B.S., Ekhlaspour L., Gaglia J.L., Hilliard M.E., Johnson E.L., et al. 3. Prevention or Delay of Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47:S43–S51. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
