Buffered 4% Articaine Reduces Pain and Enhances Anesthesia in Maxillary Third Molar Extractions: A Randomized, Double-Blind Split-Mouth Study
- PMID: 39767598
- PMCID: PMC11673001
- DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122691
Buffered 4% Articaine Reduces Pain and Enhances Anesthesia in Maxillary Third Molar Extractions: A Randomized, Double-Blind Split-Mouth Study
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Buffered local anesthetics are suggested to enhance patient comfort and anesthetic efficacy during dental procedures. However, their advantages over non-buffered solutions in maxillary third molar extractions remain under-investigated. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study aimed to compare the efficacy of buffered versus non-buffered 4% articaine in terms of pain, anesthetic onset, and the duration of anesthesia during maxillary third molar extractions. Methods: Each participant randomly received two buccal infiltrations on two single appointments to extract maxillary third molars: one with 4% articaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate and the other with non-buffered 4% articaine. Pain during injection, post-extraction pain, onset time, and the duration of anesthesia were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0-10). Results: Fifty adult participants (23 males and 27 females) with a mean age of 21.6 years were included in the study. Buffered 4% articaine significantly reduced injection pain (mean VAS: 3.12 ± 1.36 vs. 4.2 ± 0.3, p = 0.0001) and post-extraction pain (mean VAS: 4.4 ± 1.75 vs. 5.76 ± 1.78, p = 0.0002) compared to non-buffered articaine. Additionally, buffered articaine demonstrated a faster onset of anesthesia (mean time (seconds): 85.92 ± 27.37 vs. 126.86 ± 33.15, p < 0.0001) and a longer duration of anesthesia (mean duration (minutes): 70.4 ± 13.64 vs. 51.4 ± 7.2, p < 0.0001). Regarding gender's factor, the comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in pain perception between males and females for either injection pain or post-extraction pain. Conclusions: Buffered 4% articaine provides superior anesthetic efficacy compared to non-buffered 4% articaine, enhancing patient comfort by reducing pain, accelerating onset, and prolonging the duration of anesthesia during maxillary third molar extractions.
Keywords: articaine; buffers; local infiltration; third molars; tooth extraction.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Oct;22(5):387-394. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387. Epub 2022 Sep 27. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 36246033 Free PMC article.
-
Buffered 4% Articaine as a Primary Buccal Infiltration of the Mandibular First Molar: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study.J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1403-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 18. J Endod. 2015. PMID: 26095381 Clinical Trial.
-
Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):203-212. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.203. Epub 2020 Aug 27. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32934986 Free PMC article.
-
Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3527-3533. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03674-x. Epub 2020 Nov 5. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33151422 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of Articaine vs Lignocaine for infiltration anaesthesia during primary molar extractions.Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):1048-1055. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5343. Pak J Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35634630 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Thiem D.G.E., Schnaith F., Van Aken C.M.E., Köntges A., Kumar V.V., Al-Nawas B., Kämmerer P.W. Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: Comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018;22:1523–1530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2251-7. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Diniz J.A., Dourado A., Barbirato D.D.S., de Oliveira M.S.V., de Lira V., de Melo Filho S.M.C., da Silveira K.G., Laureano Filho J.R. Evaluation of the effects of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration on preemptive multimodal analgesia and anxiety in third molar surgeries: A triple-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2024;28:304. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05700-8. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources