Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 28;12(12):2723.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122723.

Critical Analysis of Cytoplasmic Progression of Inflammatory Signaling Suggests Potential Pharmacologic Targets for Wound Healing and Fibrotic Disorders

Affiliations
Review

Critical Analysis of Cytoplasmic Progression of Inflammatory Signaling Suggests Potential Pharmacologic Targets for Wound Healing and Fibrotic Disorders

Michael L Samulevich et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Successful skin wound healing is dependent on an interplay between epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts as they react to local extracellular factors (DAMPs, PAMPs, cytokines, etc.) surveyed from that environment by numerous membrane receptors (e.g., TLRs, cytokine receptors, etc.). In turn, those receptors are the start of a cytoplasmic signaling pathway where balance is key to effective healing and, as needed, cell and matrix regeneration. When directed through NF-κB, these signaling routes lead to transient responses to the benefit of initiating immune cell recruitment, cell replication, local chemokine and cytokine production, and matrix protein synthesis. The converse can also occur, where ongoing canonical NF-κB activation leads to chronic, hyper-responsive states. Here, we assess three key players, TAK1, TNFAIP3, and TNIP1, in cytoplasmic regulation of NF-κB activation, which, because of their distinctive and yet inter-related functions, either promote or limit that activation. Their balanced function is integral to successful wound healing, given their significant control over the expression of inflammation-, fibrosis-, and matrix remodeling-associated genes. Intriguingly, these three proteins have also been emphasized in dysregulated NF-κB signaling central to systemic sclerosis (SSc). Notably, diffuse SSc shares some tissue features similar to an excessive inflammatory/fibrotic wound response without eventual resolution. Taking a cue from certain instances of aberrant wound healing and SSc having some shared aspects, e.g., chronic inflammation and fibrosis, this review looks for the first time, to our knowledge, at what those pathologies might have in common regarding the cytoplasmic progression of NF-κB-mediated signaling. Additionally, while TAK1, TNFAIP3, and TNIP1 are often investigated and reported on individually, we propose them here as three proteins whose consequences of function are very highly interconnected at the signaling focus of NF-κB. We thus highlight the emerging promise for the eventual clinical benefit derived from an improved understanding of these integral signal progression modulators. Depending on the protein, its indirect or direct pharmacological regulation has been reported. Current findings support further intensive studies of these points in NF-κB regulation both for their basic function in healthy cells as well as with the goal of targeting them for translational benefit in multiple cutaneous wound healing situations, whether stemming from acute injury or a dysregulated inflammatory/fibrotic response.

Keywords: chronic wounds; cytokines; inflammation; keratinocytes; scleroderma; wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TAK1, TNFAIP3, and TNIP1 are focal point for regulating activation of NF-κB, leading to wound healing and fibrotic disorder gene expression (see text). In brief, function of TAK1 leads to progression of cytoplasmic signaling downstream of the indicated receptors, while TNFAIP3 and TNIP1 restrict continuation of the signal. Created in Biorender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stroncek J.D., Reichert W.M. Frontiers in Neuroengineering. Overview of Wound Healing in Different Tissue Types. In: Reichert W.M., editor. Indwelling Neural Implants: Strategies for Contending with the In Vivo Environment. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2008.
    1. Rodrigues M., Kosaric N., Bonham C.A., Gurtner G.C. Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective. Physiol. Rev. 2019;99:665–706. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00067.2017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCoy S.S., Reed T.J., Berthier C.C., Tsou P.S., Liu J., Gudjonsson J.E., Khanna D., Kahlenberg J.M. Scleroderma keratinocytes promote fibroblast activation independent of transforming growth factor beta. Rheumatology. 2017;56:1970–1981. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stone R.C., Chen V., Burgess J., Pannu S., Tomic-Canic M. Genomics of Human Fibrotic Diseases: Disordered Wound Healing Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8590. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228590. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wojtowicz A.M., Oliveira S., Carlson M.W., Zawadzka A., Rousseau C.F., Baksh D. The importance of both fibroblasts and keratinocytes in a bilayered living cellular construct used in wound healing. Wound Repair. Regen. 2014;22:246–255. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12154. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources