Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 30;11(12):1468.
doi: 10.3390/children11121468.

Executive Functions Assessment in a Child with Autism: A Pilot Single-Case Study from a Longitudinal and Mixed Methods Approach

Affiliations

Executive Functions Assessment in a Child with Autism: A Pilot Single-Case Study from a Longitudinal and Mixed Methods Approach

Marian Acero-Ferrero et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Although the literature confirms executive deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) that hinder adaptation, evidence-based intervention programs targeting this area are scarce, and even fewer have evaluated their effectiveness.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess a pilot program designed to improve the executive functions of a child five years and nine months in age with ASD.

Methods: To evaluate the effects of the intervention, observational methodology was used, which is considered a mixed method in itself as it integrates both qualitative and quantitative elements in its various phases. Specifically, an idiographic, longitudinal, and multidimensional design was followed. A lag sequential analysis was conducted using GSEQ software Version 5.1, enabling us to study changes in the executive functions of a child before, during, and after the intervention, including whether its effects are sustained over time.

Results: The sequential patterns obtained indicate more appropriate and complex executive functioning after the three-month intervention, specifically increased cognitive flexibility, improved self-regulation, more accurate evaluation, and progress in inhibitory processes. However, these improvements do not persist over time.

Conclusion: This study contributes to the scarcely explored field of executive function interventions in children with ASD, although it is necessary to consider the generalization of the results to other contexts, such as family and school, during interaction with peers.

Keywords: assessment; autism spectrum disorder; intervention; lag sequential analysis; mixed methods; systematic observation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Working memory task patterns: pre-intervention session.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Working memory task patterns: post-intervention session.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Working memory task patterns: maintenance session.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Flexibility task patterns: pre-intervention session.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Flexibility task patterns: early-stage intervention.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Flexibility task patterns: mid-stage intervention.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Flexibility task patterns: late-stage intervention.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Flexibility task patterns: post-intervention session.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Flexibility task patterns: maintenance session.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Inhibition task patterns: pre-intervention session.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Inhibition task patterns: early-stage intervention.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Inhibition task patterns: mid-stage intervention.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Inhibition task patterns: late-stage intervention.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Inhibition task patterns: post-intervention session.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Inhibition task patterns: maintenance session.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Procedure, Intervention, and assessment tools used in each phase.

Similar articles

References

    1. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013;64:135–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zelazo P.D., Carlson S.M. The neurodevelopment of executive function skills: Implications for academic achievement gaps. Psychol. Neurosci. 2020;13:273–298. doi: 10.1037/pne0000208. - DOI
    1. Diamond A., Ling D.S. Conclusions About Interventions, Programs, and Approaches for Improving Executive Functions That Appear Justified and Those That, Despite Much Hype, Do Not. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2016;18:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedman N.P., Miyake A. Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions: Individual Differences as a Window on Cognitive Structure. Cortex. 2017;86:186–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cogn. Psychol. 2000;41:49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources