Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 13;13(24):7599.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13247599.

High-Intensity Training Telerehabilitation for Persons with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Clinical Trial

Affiliations

High-Intensity Training Telerehabilitation for Persons with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Clinical Trial

Timo Meus et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: High-intensity training (HIT) has been shown to enhance physical fitness and reduce functional impairments in persons with moderately disabling chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP). However, sustaining these improvements post-rehabilitation remains a challenge. To address this, a home-based, technology-supported HIT program utilizing telerehabilitation can be implemented at home. This study assesses the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a telerehabilitation HIT program for persons with CNSLBP. Methods: The pilot clinical trial (NCT05234008) recruited 15 persons with CNSLBP. Participants completed a 6-week multimodal HIT intervention with 12 bi-weekly sessions. The first four sessions were organized at REVAL Research Center, followed by eight home-based sessions using the Physitrack® platform. Assessments were conducted at baseline (PRE), two weeks into the intervention (MID), and immediately post-intervention (POST). Outcome measures included maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) testing, disease-related outcomes, feasibility, motivation assessed via questionnaires, and system usability and adherence tracked through Physitrack® technology. Results: Fourteen participants (seven females; age: 45.9 years) successfully completed the program without adverse events. Based on PRE-POST comparisons, motivation levels remained high (Motivation Visual Analog Scale: -1.2 ± 0.9, p = 0.043) despite reduced motivation at POST. Improvements were also observed in pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale: -1.8 ± 0.2, p = 0.026), disability (Modified Oswestry Disability Index: -12.1 ± 10.2, p = 0.002), fear-avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Components Scale: -10.1 ± 5.8, p = 0.005), and exercise capacity (VO2max: 4.4 ± 1.6, p = 0.048). Conclusions: The HITHOME study is the first to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a telerehabilitation HIT program for persons with CNSLBP. The results underscore the feasibility of implementing a home-based HIT program to support adherence to vigorous exercise programs and improve clinical outcomes in this population. Additionally, the findings emphasize technology's potential importance in enhancing home-based exercise therapy and lay the groundwork for future studies on blended care and telerehabilitation using HIT in CNSLBP.

Keywords: blended care; chronic nonspecific low back pain; high-intensity training; telerehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visualization of the HIT program in the Physitrack mobile application consisting of trunk strength exercises (1) and cardiorespiratory interval training (2). Exercises were displayed with a video/picture guide and written instructions (3). The therapist could follow the participant’s adherence through a clear progression graph (4).

Similar articles

References

    1. Buchbinder R., van Tulder M., Öberg B., Costa L.M., Woolf A., Schoene M., Croft P. Low back pain: A call for action. Lancet. 2018;391:2384–2388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30488-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen S., Chen M., Wu X., Lin S., Tao C., Cao H., Shao Z., Xiao G. Global, regional and national burden of low back pain 1990–2019: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. J. Orthop. Transl. 2022;32:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.07.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shin D.W., Shin J.I., Koyanagi A., Jacob L., Smith L., Lee H., Chang Y., Song T.J. Global, regional, and national neck pain burden in the general population, 1990–2019: An analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. Front. Neurol. 2022;13:955367. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.955367. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shiri R., Falah-Hassani K., Heliövaara M., Solovieva S., Amiri S., Lallukka T., Burdorf A., Husgafvel-Pursiainen K., Viikari-Juntura E. Risk Factors for Low Back Pain: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71:290–299. doi: 10.1002/acr.23710. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartvigsen J., Hancock M.J., Kongsted A., Louw Q., Ferreira M.L., Genevay S., Hoy D., Karppinen J., Pransky G., Sieper J., et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391:2356–2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources