Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 13;25(24):13371.
doi: 10.3390/ijms252413371.

Should Artificial Intelligence Play a Durable Role in Biomedical Research and Practice?

Affiliations
Review

Should Artificial Intelligence Play a Durable Role in Biomedical Research and Practice?

Pierre Bongrand. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

During the last decade, artificial intelligence (AI) was applied to nearly all domains of human activity, including scientific research. It is thus warranted to ask whether AI thinking should be durably involved in biomedical research. This problem was addressed by examining three complementary questions (i) What are the major barriers currently met by biomedical investigators? It is suggested that during the last 2 decades there was a shift towards a growing need to elucidate complex systems, and that this was not sufficiently fulfilled by previously successful methods such as theoretical modeling or computer simulation (ii) What is the potential of AI to meet the aforementioned need? it is suggested that recent AI methods are well-suited to perform classification and prediction tasks on multivariate systems, and possibly help in data interpretation, provided their efficiency is properly validated. (iii) Recent representative results obtained with machine learning suggest that AI efficiency may be comparable to that displayed by human operators. It is concluded that AI should durably play an important role in biomedical practice. Also, as already suggested in other scientific domains such as physics, combining AI with conventional methods might generate further progress and new applications, involving heuristic and data interpretation.

Keywords: deep learning; immunology; machine learning; omic; statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Early mechanisms of inflammation. A blood leukocyte flowing with a velocity of several hundreds of µm/s in a capillary blood vessel (0) is bound by selectin molecules expressed on the membrane of endothelial cells subjected to an inflammatory stimulus (1). This results in a nearly hundredfold velocity reduction, leading to a jerky motion called rolling (2). Cytokines bound to the membrane of activated endothelial cells then activate the surface integrins of rolling leukocytes, leading to a firm attachment to cell adhesion molecules expressed by endothelial cells (3). The leukocyte will then transmigrate towards surrounding tissues (4, 5, 6).
Figure 2
Figure 2
TCR-mediated T-lymphocyte activation. The figure shows a minimal view of molecules participating in the initial step of T-lymphocyte activation: An antigen presenting cell (APC) displays tens of thousands of major histocompatibility molecules (MHC) bearing various oligopeptides (p). The T cell receptor (TCR) is associated with the so-called CD3 complex typically made of three dimers (γε, δε, ζζ), the cytoplasmic part of which contains tyrosine-bearing motives (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs called ITAMs, shown as colored ellipses). The association between a TCR and its cognate pMHC ligand enhances the binding of a co-receptor (such as CD8 on the figure) that is often associated with a tyrosine kinase (lck). TCR-pMHC interaction will thus trigger the phosphorylation of ITAMs by lck, and phosphorylated ITAMs act as docking sites for another kinase (zeta-associated protein of 70 kDa, ZAP70). Note this is a very simplified view. More details may be found elsewhere [38].

Similar articles

References

    1. Wang H., Fu T., Du Y., Gao W., Huang K., Liu Z., Chandak P., Liu S., Van Katwyk P., Deac A., et al. Scientific Discovery in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Nature. 2023;620:47–60. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Messeri L., Crockett M.J. Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research. Nature. 2024;627:49–58. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nabi I.R., Cardoen B., Khater I.M., Gao G., Wong T.H., Hamarneh G. AI Analysis of Super-Resolution Microscopy: Biological Discovery in the Absence of Ground Truth. J. Cell Biol. 2024;223:e202311073. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202311073. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen A.R. Research Training in an AI World. J. Clin. Investig. 2023;133:e173283. doi: 10.1172/JCI173283. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Y., Zhang S.-R., Momtaz A., Moradi R., Rastegarnia F., Sahakyan N., Shakeri S., Li L. Can AI Understand Our Universe? Test of Fine-Tuning GPT by Astrophysical Data. arXiv. 20242404.10019

LinkOut - more resources