A controlled evaluation of rural regional perinatal care: impact on mortality and morbidity
- PMID: 3976948
- PMCID: PMC1646184
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.75.3.246
A controlled evaluation of rural regional perinatal care: impact on mortality and morbidity
Abstract
The impact of a rural regional perinatal care (RPC) program was assessed by a quasi-experimental, controlled, population-based design. Outcome measures included changes in five-year average fetal and neonatal mortality rates as well as short-term obstetric and newborn morbidity. Declines in fetal and neonatal as well as birthweight specific mortality rates were observed for both pilot and control regions, for both races, and especially for 1501-2500 g infants. However, comparisons of preprogram (1966-74) and postprogram (1975-80) average yearly changes showed no statistically significant differences between regions. While the incidence of prenatal morbidity was the same for both regions, intrapartum and newborn morbidity significantly favored the pilot region. These results were difficult to interpret. Program relevant implications of the findings in relation to rural RPC in North Carolina are discussed. Specific benefits appeared to be associated with the development of two high-risk maternity clinics and a Level II center capability in the pilot region. The importance of community support and public/private sector cooperation in relation to RPC is noted.
Similar articles
-
Controlled evaluation of rural regional perinatal care: developmental and neurologic outcomes at 1 year.Pediatrics. 1986 Feb;77(2):187-95. Pediatrics. 1986. PMID: 3945531
-
Outcome of very-low-birth-weight infants: does antepartum versus neonatal referral have a better impact on mortality, morbidity, or long-term outcome?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;160(3):539-45. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(89)80022-5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989. PMID: 2929671
-
Perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in North Carolina, 1968-1994.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;184(6):1302-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114484. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11349206
-
Organisation of perinatal/neonatal care.Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1993 Jan;385:1-18. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8435546 Review.
-
Emphasis on preventive perinatology: a suitable alternative for developing countries.Semin Perinatol. 1988 Oct;12(4):381-8. Semin Perinatol. 1988. PMID: 3065947 Review.
Cited by
-
[The transportation problem--transportation in utero compared to transportation of the newborn infant].Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1987;242(1-4):829-36. doi: 10.1007/BF01783371. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1987. PMID: 3688976 German. No abstract available.
-
Preventing and postponing death: trends in Tennessee infant mortality.Am J Public Health. 1991 Aug;81(8):1046-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.8.1046. Am J Public Health. 1991. PMID: 1853998 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a community-based enriched model prenatal intervention project in the District of Columbia.Health Serv Res. 1996 Dec;31(5):609-21. Health Serv Res. 1996. PMID: 8943993 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes of regionalized perinatal care in Washington State.West J Med. 1988 Jul;149(1):98-102. West J Med. 1988. PMID: 3407173 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal Outcomes According to Accessibility to Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Intensive Care Units by Region in Korea.J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Mar 14;37(10):e77. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e77. J Korean Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35289138 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical