Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 13;17(12):1686.
doi: 10.3390/ph17121686.

Comparative Analyses of the Safety Profiles of Vitamin D Receptor Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the EudraVigilance Database

Affiliations

Comparative Analyses of the Safety Profiles of Vitamin D Receptor Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the EudraVigilance Database

Zsolt Gáll et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Vitamin D receptor (VDR) agonists are commonly used in clinical practice for their roles in calcium regulation and potential benefits in various diseases. However, their safety profiles, particularly for compounds available as food supplements, remain underexplored in real-world settings. This study aimed to analyze the safety profiles of VDR agonists using the EudraVigilance database, focusing on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported between 1 January 2004 and 23 June 2024. Methods: Data for ten VDR agonists were collected, de-duplicated, and analyzed to identify specific safety signals. Risk factors for specific ADRs were assessed using multiple logistic regression. Results: This study analyzed 5,369,581 reports in the EudraVigilance system, from which 17,947 reports (0.33%) involving 80,050 ADRs were linked to VDR agonists. The most-reported drugs were cholecalciferol (12,944 cases) and calcitriol (1355 cases). Serious ADRs were more prevalent with paricalcitol, alfacalcidol, and calcitriol than with cholecalciferol (p < 0.05). Hypercalcemia was a hallmark ADR for all VDR agonists, with the highest risk linked to dihydrotachysterol (ROR = 5668; 95%CI = 3332 to 9641; p < 0.0001), alfacalcidol (ROR = 965.7; 95%CI = 843.6 to 1106; p < 0.0001), and calcitriol (ROR = 726.0; 95%CI = 634.6 to 830.5; p < 0.0001). Logistic regression highlighted dehydration, overdose, and concomitant administration of calcium salts as major predictors of hypercalcemia. The co-administration of multiple VDR agonists was also found to increase hypercalcemia risk. However, the disproportionality analysis showed that only active VDR agonists (e.g., calcitriol, alfacalcidol) were associated with severe complications like renal and urinary disorders and cardiac issues due to hypercalcemia. Natural precursors (cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol) were more often linked to non-calcemic ADRs such as gastrointestinal symptoms, which were more prevalent in infants and children compared to adults. Conclusions: The safety profiles of VDR agonists differ significantly between compounds. Active derivatives require close monitoring for serious calcemia-related complications, whereas cholecalciferol is associated with less severe ADRs, primarily in at-risk populations. These findings highlight the need for targeted safety monitoring and further research into the real-world uses of VDR agonists.

Keywords: calcitriol; pharmacovigilance; safety profile; vitamin D; vitamin D receptor agonists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patterns in adverse drug reaction reporting for vitamin D receptor agonists in the EudraVigilance database over the study period. Asterisk marks that data for this period were obtained by extrapolating the number of cases registered in the first half of the year.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reporting odds ratio (ROR) for hypercalcemia induced by vitamin D receptor agonists. Data is presented as with ROR with 95% confidence interval for all vitamin D agonists that had the minimum of three cases registered.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zhang R., Naughton D.P. Vitamin D in health and disease: Current perspectives. Nutr. J. 2010;9:65. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-65. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kongsbak M., Levring T.B., Geisler C., von Essen M.R. The Vitamin D Receptor and T Cell Function. Front. Immunol. 2013;4:51253. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daryabor G., Gholijani N., Kahmini F.R. A review of the critical role of vitamin D axis on the immune system. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2023;132–133:104866. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2023.104866. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Condoleo V., Pelaia C., Armentaro G., Severini G., Clausi E., Cassano V., Miceli S., Fiorentino T.V., Succurro E., Arturi F., et al. Role of Vitamin D in Cardiovascular Diseases. Endocrines. 2021;2:417–426. doi: 10.3390/endocrines2040037. - DOI
    1. Izzo M., Carrizzo A., Izzo C., Cappello E., Cecere D., Ciccarelli M., Iannece P., Damato A., Vecchione C., Pompeo F. Vitamin D: Not Just Bone Metabolism but a Key Player in Cardiovascular Diseases. Life. 2021;11:452. doi: 10.3390/life11050452. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources