Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 17;12(12):2605.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122605.

Resistant Rhodococcus for Biodegradation of Diesel Fuel at High Concentration and Low Temperature

Irina Ivshina  1   2 , Maria Kuyukina  1   2 , Anastasiia Krivoruchko  1   2 , Andrey Elkin  1   2 , Tatyana Peshkur  3 , Colin J Cunningham  3
Affiliations

Resistant Rhodococcus for Biodegradation of Diesel Fuel at High Concentration and Low Temperature

Irina Ivshina et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

The resistance of 16 Rhodococcus strains to diesel fuel was studied. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of diesel fuel against Rhodococcus were 4.0-64.0 vol. % and 0.5-16.0 vol. % after 7 days of incubation in Luria-Bertani broth and a mineral "Rhodococcus-surfactant" medium, respectively. The three most resistant strains (R. ruber IEGM 231, IEGM 442 and Rhodococcus sp. IEGM 1276) capable of overcoming the toxicity of diesel fuel at a high (8.0 vol. %) concentration and at a low (4 °C) temperature were selected. Respiration activities, growth kinetics, and changes in the diesel fuel composition during the biodegradation process were elucidated using gas chromatography with mass spectrometry, respirometry, and Bradford analysis. Growth conditions were optimised for the improved biodegradation of diesel fuel by Rhodococcus cells using multifactor analysis. They included the simultaneous addition of 1.3 g·L-1 of granular sugar and 0.25 g·L-1 of yeast extract. The twofold stimulation of the biodegradation of individual hydrocarbons in diesel fuel (n-pentadecane, n-hexadecane and n-heptadecane) was demonstrated when glycolipid Rhodococcus-biosurfactants were added at a concentration of 1.4 g·L-1. A total removal of 71-91% of diesel fuel was achieved in this work.

Keywords: Rhodococcus; biodegradation; biosurfactants; diesel fuel; growth kinetics; heavy contamination; low temperatures; no catabolite repression; resistance; respirometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calibration curve between concentration of bovine serum albumin and A595 nm for Bradford analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dynamics of total removal of diesel fuel at a concentration of 8.0 vol. % and temperature of 28 °C in the presence of R. ruber IEGM 442 cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
GC-MS chromatograms of original (a) and residual diesel fuel after 8 days of biodegradation using R. ruber IEGM 442 cells at 28 °C (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Biodegradation of individual hydrocarbons in diesel fuel at its concentration of 8.0 vol. %, at 28 °C in 8 days by R. ruber IEGM 442 cells without (a) and in the presence (b) of Rhodococcus-biosurfactants added at a concentration of 1.4 g·L−1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Respiratory activities of Rhodococcus strains during the biodegradation of different concentrations of diesel fuel at 28 °C. The parameters measured were as follows: (a) consumption of O2, μL; (b) production of CO2, μL; (c) rate of O2 consumption, μL·min−1; and (d) rate of CO2 production, μL·min−1.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Growth kinetics of Rhodococcus sp. IEGM 1276 cells in the presence of 2.0 and 3.0 vol. % diesel fuel at 4 °C.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Pareto diagrams showing the effects of sugar, diesel fuel, and yeast extract concentrations on the number of R. erythropolis IEGM 587 cells (a) and the biodegradation of diesel fuel (b).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brown K.E., King C.K., Kotzakoulakis K., George S.C., Harrison P.L. Assessing fuel spill risks in polar waters: Temporal dynamics and behaviour of hydrocarbons from Antarctic diesel, marine gas oil and residual fuel oil. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016;110:343–353. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gao P., Zhang Y., Zhao L. Synthetic zeolites derived from fly ash as effective mineral sorbents for diesel fuel spill remediation. Clays Clay Miner. 2016;64:552–559. doi: 10.1346/CCMN.2016.064035. - DOI
    1. Glyaznetsova Y.S., Nemirovskaya I.A., Flint M.V. Study of the effects of an accidental diesel fuel spill in Norilsk. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2021;501:994–999. doi: 10.1134/S1028334X21110052. - DOI
    1. Muthohharoh T., Latumahina L.J., Suyanta S., Suherman S. Analysis of petroleum products spill potential impact (gasoline and diesel fuels) on soil fertility quality around Pertamina Rewulu-Cilacap pipeline Bantul-Yogyakarta. Molekul. 2023;18:170–177. doi: 10.20884/1.jm.2023.18.2.5402. - DOI
    1. Imbery J.J., Buday C., Miliano R.C., Shang D., Kwok H., Helbing C.C. Salmonid smolt caudal fin and liver transcriptome responses to low sulfur marine diesel and high sulfur fuel oil water accommodated fractions for assessing oil spill effects in marine environments. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024;279:116463. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116463. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources