Susceptibility Patterns in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium avium Complex from a Hospital in Southern Spain
- PMID: 39770815
- PMCID: PMC11679255
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12122613
Susceptibility Patterns in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium avium Complex from a Hospital in Southern Spain
Abstract
The incidence of infections caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) has risen significantly, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study analyzed 134 clinical isolates of the Mycobacterium avium complex from southern Spain, performing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing using a commercial microdilution technique to generate additional data, refine treatment strategies, and improve patient outcomes. Phenotypic susceptibility testing revealed clarithromycin and amikacin as the most effective antibiotics, with susceptibility rates exceeding 90%, while linezolid and moxifloxacin exhibited limited activity, with resistance rates of 49.3% and 41.8%. A comparative analysis between M. avium and M. intracellulare showed significant differences in resistance to amikacin and linezolid, with M. avium exhibiting higher resistance rates. Additionally, species-specific differences were observed in MIC distributions for ethionamide, ciprofloxacin, and streptomycin. Our data reveal regional variability in resistance patterns, particularly for moxifloxacin and linezolid, which exhibit differing resistance rates compared to studies from other regions. The significant MIC differences for several antibiotics between M. avium and M. intracellulare underscore the importance of species-level identification and the heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms within MAC.
Keywords: AST; MAC; Mycobacterium; antibiotics; susceptibility profiles.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Phenotypic drug-susceptibility profiles and genetic analysis based on whole-genome sequencing of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates in Thailand.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0294677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294677. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37992075 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;12(1):64. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010064. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36671265 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro activity of aminoglycosides, clofazimine, d-cycloserine and dapsone against 83 Mycobacterium avium complex clinical isolates.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Oct;51(5):636-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 28. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018. PMID: 28705770
-
Variability of Mycobacterium avium Complex Isolates Drug Susceptibility Testing by Broth Microdilution.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 4;11(12):1756. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121756. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36551413 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clofazimine susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus: a meta-analysis study.J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Sep;26:188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 19. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021. PMID: 34153525 Review.
Cited by
-
Detection of a Mixed-Strain Infection with Drug- and Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium avium Subspecies hominissuis in a Dog with Generalized Lymphadenomegaly.Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Apr 19;14(4):416. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14040416. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40298584 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases