Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 18;12(12):2622.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122622.

Development of Effective Medical Countermeasures Against the Main Biowarfare Agents: The Importance of Antibodies

Affiliations
Review

Development of Effective Medical Countermeasures Against the Main Biowarfare Agents: The Importance of Antibodies

Arnaud Avril et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

The COVID-19 and mpox crisis has reminded the world of the potentially catastrophic consequences of biological agents. Aside from the natural risk, biological agents can also be weaponized or used for bioterrorism. Dissemination in a population or among livestock could be used to destabilize a nation by creating a climate of terror, by negatively impacting the economy and undermining institutions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classify biological agents into three categories (A or Tier 1, B and C) according to the risk they pose to the public and national security. Category A or Tier 1 consists of the six pathogens with the highest risk to the population (Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, botulinum neurotoxins, smallpox and viral hemorrhagic fevers). Several medical countermeasures, such as vaccines, antibodies and chemical drugs, have been developed to prevent or cure the diseases induced by these pathogens. This review presents an overview of the primary medical countermeasures, and in particular, of the antibodies available against the six pathogens on the CDC's Tier 1 agents list, as well as against ricin.

Keywords: anthrax; antibodies; antitoxin; biodefense; botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs); medical countermeasure; ricin; therapeutic antibody; toxoids; vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Trevisanato S.I. The “Hittite Plague”, an Epidemic of Tularemia and the First Record of Biological Warfare. Med. Hypotheses. 2007;69:1371–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.03.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wheelis M. Biological Warfare at the 1346 Siege of Caffa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002;8:971–975. doi: 10.3201/eid0809.010536. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meselson M., Guillemin J., Hugh-Jones M., Langmuir A., Popova I., Shelokov A., Yampolskaya O. The Sverdlovsk Anthrax Outbreak of 1979. Science. 1994;266:1202–1208. doi: 10.1126/science.7973702. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Girdwood R.H. Experimentation on Prisoners by the Japanese during World War II. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1985;291:530–531. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barenblatt D. A Plague upon Humanity. 1st ed. Harper; New York, NY, USA: 2004.

LinkOut - more resources