Polymeric Materials Used in 3DP in Dentistry-Biocompatibility Testing Challenges
- PMID: 39771402
- PMCID: PMC11679966
- DOI: 10.3390/polym16243550
Polymeric Materials Used in 3DP in Dentistry-Biocompatibility Testing Challenges
Abstract
In the latter part of the 20th century, remarkable developments in new dental materials and technologies were achieved. However, regarding the impact of dental resin-based materials 3D-printed on cellular responses, there have been a limited number of published studies recently. The biocompatibility of dental restorative materials is a controversial topic, especially when discussing modern manufacturing technologies. Three-dimensional printing generates the release of residual monomers due to incomplete polymerization of materials and involves the use of potentially toxic substances in post-printing processes that cannot be completely eliminated. Considering the issue of biocompatibility, this article aims to establish an overview of this aspect, summarizing the different types of biocompatibility tests performed on materials used in 3D printing in dentistry. In order to create this comprehensive review, articles dealing with the issue of 3D printing in dentistry were analysed by accessing the main specialized search engines using specific keywords. Relevant data referring to types of materials used in 3DP to manufacture various dental devices, polymerization methods, factors affecting monomer release, cytotoxicity of unreacted products or post-curing treatments, and methods for assessing biocompatibility were analysed. Although the introduction of new restorative materials used in dental treatments is subject to national and international regulations and standards, it is necessary to investigate them regarding biocompatibility in order to support or deny the manufacturers' statements regarding this aspect.
Keywords: 3D printing in dentistry; biocompatibility of 3D-printed materials; biocompatibility tests; cytotoxicity; dental materials; polymers; residual monomers; temporary prosthetic restorations; viability.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed Dental Resins: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Jan 5;16(1):e51721. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51721. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38318586 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Degree of conversion and residual monomer elution of 3D-printed, milled and self-cured resin-based composite materials for temporary dental crowns and bridges.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2023 May 12;34(5):23. doi: 10.1007/s10856-023-06729-z. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2023. PMID: 37173418 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical and Biocompatibility Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Resin Reinforced with Glass Silica and Zirconia Nanoparticles: In Vitro Study.Polymers (Basel). 2023 May 30;15(11):2523. doi: 10.3390/polym15112523. Polymers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37299322 Free PMC article.
-
Materials and Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: An Overview.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;12(1):1. doi: 10.3390/dj12010001. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38275676 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Color and optical properties of 3D printing restorative polymer-based materials: A scoping review.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Sep;34(6):853-864. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12904. Epub 2022 Mar 29. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022. PMID: 35347852 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Influence of the Processing Method on the Nano-Mechanical Properties and Porosity of Dental Acrylic Resins Fabricated by Heat-Curing, 3D Printing and Milling Techniques.Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;13(7):311. doi: 10.3390/dj13070311. Dent J (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40710157 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cheramie T., Strother E. The dentist’s armamentarium: A collection of 19th century instruments in the Louisiana State University School of Dentistry Library. J. Hist. Dent. 2008;56:107–118. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources