Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan-Dec:62:469580241309194.
doi: 10.1177/00469580241309194.

Outcomes of Age-Friendly Health Systems: Return to Clinic After 4Ms Care Delivery

Affiliations

Outcomes of Age-Friendly Health Systems: Return to Clinic After 4Ms Care Delivery

Grace Q Armstrong et al. Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

The Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) movement continues to grow in the United States as more health systems implement the 4Ms framework. Despite this growth, there are relatively few studies that evaluate outcomes related to AFHS implementation. This study assessed patient satisfaction with AFHS by analyzing the rate at which patients returned to the clinic for future health care, serving as a measure of quality. A retrospective cohort design using electronic health record (EHR) data obtained from patients 65 years of age and older who received care at a large national network of convenient care clinics in the U.S. (N = 987,197) between January 2021 and March 2024. We assessed the level of AFHS 4Ms care received by these individuals in relation to their subsequent visit back to the clinic through descriptive statistics, a time-to-event analysis using the Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence approach, and a Cox proportional Hazards model, adjusted for age, race, sex, prior appointments, and number of ICD-10 code diagnoses. Throughout the study period, patients who received complete AFHS 4Ms care exhibited greater rates of returning to the convenient care clinic compared to those who received partial or no 4Ms 4Ms care. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the cumulative probability of returning to the clinic was higher in patients that received 4Ms over time, compared to patients that did not receive 4Ms. Results from the Cox Proportional Hazards model demonstrated a risk ratio of 3.91 (p < .001) of returning to the clinic, after adjustment. The results indicate that patients are more likely to seek additional care in the future at the same health system when they receive complete 4Ms care, possibly due to increased satisfaction with care. As patient satisfaction is an indicator of quality care, this finding can further inform and spread the AFHS movement.

Keywords: 4Ms framework; age-friendly health system; consumer satisfaction; convenient care clinic; patient outcomes; patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual model of the relationship between healthcare quality, patient satisfaction, and returning to the same convenient care clinic system for care, adapted from Quigley et al. -
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percent of patients with a return clinic visit within 1 year of an index visit, stratified by the maximum number of age-friendly ms received per visit, from 2021 to 2023.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier cumulative hazard analysis demonstrating the probability of a return clinic visit over a year by the maximum number of Ms received per visit, from 2021 to 2024.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Cox-Proportional hazard ratios demonstrating the rate of return clinic visits from 1 day to 1 year after index visit stratified by the number of Ms received per visit, adjusted by age group, race, gender, number of ICD-10 code diagnoses documented in patients’ electronic health record, and number of prior appointments during the study period from 2021 to 2024.

Similar articles

References

    1. Fulmer T, Mate KS, Berman A. The age-friendly health system imperative. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(1):22-24. doi:10.1111/jgs.15076 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fulmer T, Pelton L. Age-Friendly Health Systems: A Guide to Using the 4Ms While Caring for Older Adults. Institute for Healthcare Improvment; 2022. Accessed August 15, 2024. https://www.abebooks.com/9781544527482/Age-Friendly-Health-Systems-Guide...
    1. United Nations. (2023, January). World Social Report 2023: Leaving No One Behind In An Ageing World. UN DESA Publications. https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-social-report-2023-le...
    1. Kalache A, Gatti A. Active ageing: a policy framework. Adv Gerontol. 2003;11:7-18. - PubMed
    1. Fulmer T, Patel P, Levy N, et al.. Moving toward a global age-friendly ecosystem. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(9):1936-1940. doi:10.1111/jgs.16675 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources