Real-world effectiveness of hemodialysis modalities: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 39773397
- PMCID: PMC11706171
- DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03934-y
Real-world effectiveness of hemodialysis modalities: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Results from the CONVINCE clinical trial suggest a 23% mortality risk reduction among patients receiving high-volume (> 23 L) hemodiafiltration. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of blood-based kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with hemodiafiltration vs. hemodialysis in a large, unselected patient population treated prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed pseudonymized data from 85,117 adults receiving in-center care across NephroCare clinics in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa during 2019-2022. Cox regression models with KRT modality and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status as time-varying covariates, and adjusted for multiple confounders, were used to estimate all-cause (primary) and cardiovascular (secondary) mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for age, dialysis vintage, COVID-19 status, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
Results: At baseline, 55% of patients were receiving hemodialysis and 45% of patients were receiving hemodiafiltration. Baseline characteristics were similar between baseline modalities, except that hemodiafiltration patients were a median of 2 years younger, had higher percentage of fistula access (66% vs. 47%), and had longer mean dialysis vintages (4.4 years vs. 2.6 years). Compared with hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.76-0.80), irrespective of COVID-19 infection. The pattern of a beneficial effect of hemodiafiltration was consistently observed among all analyzed subgroups. Among patients receiving high-volume hemodiafiltration (mean convection volume ≥ 23 L), the risk of death was reduced by 30% (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.68-0.72]). Hemodiafiltration was also associated with a 31% reduced risk of cardiovascular death.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that hemodiafiltration has a beneficial effect on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large, unselected patient population and across patient subgroups in real-world settings. Our study complements evidence from the CONVINCE trial and adds to the growing body of real-world evidence on hemodiafiltration.
Keywords: Cardiovascular mortality; Hemodiafiltration; High-flux hemodialysis; Kidney replacement therapy; Mortality.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Landesärztekammer Hessen (Medical Association of Hesse) in Frankfurt, Germany. All patients provided written informed consent for the secondary use of their data for scientific research purposes. In addition, pseudonymized data was extracted from the European Clinical Database (EuCliD®) database. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




References
-
- United States Renal Data System. 2023 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. 2023. https://usrds-adr.niddk.nih.gov/2023. Accessed 21 Feb 2024.
-
- Fiseha T, Osborne NJ. Burden of end-stage renal disease of undetermined etiology in Africa. Ren Replace Ther. 2023;9(1):44.
-
- Briggs V, Davies S, Wilkie M. International variations in peritoneal dialysis utilization and implications for practice. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(1):101–10. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials