Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 8;26(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08270-8.

Intraoperatively identified patellofemoral osteoarthritis: no significant impact on short-term outcomes of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Bei Li #  1   2 , Changyu Huang #  3 , Bingqian Zheng #  4 , Zida Huang  2 , Xinyu Fang  2 , Xiaoyong Wang  5 , Wenming Zhang  6
Affiliations

Intraoperatively identified patellofemoral osteoarthritis: no significant impact on short-term outcomes of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Bei Li et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background and objective: The efficacy of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with intraoperatively identified patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) has been a subject of debate. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the early outcomes of UKA in patients with varying intraoperative PFOA conditions and to explore the relationship between the location of PFOA and the position of the prosthesis post-UKA. Our aim was to determine whether the presence of PFOA affects the short-term success of medial UKA.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included patients who underwent UKA by a same surgical team from March 2021 to November 2022. Patients were categorized into normal, medial, middle, and lateral groups based on the intraoperative PFOA findings. A total of 103 patients were analyzed, with data collected on demographics, intraoperative details, and pre- and postoperative laboratory and imaging data. Patellofemoral joint cartilage damage was assessed using the Outerbridge classification. Postoperative patellofemoral joint function was evaluated using the Lonner score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in postoperative Lonner pain scores, Lonner functional scores, OKS, and VAS compared to preoperative values for all groups (P < 0.05). Medial and middle PFOA identified intraoperatively did not affect the short-term efficacy of medial UKA. Although lateral PFOA had some impact on UKA efficacy, patients still experienced significant postoperative pain relief and functional improvement. Differences in the tibial component posterior slope angle (TCPSA) were noted among the groups, particularly between the medial and lateral groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Intraoperatively identified medial and middle PFOA do not influence the short-term efficacy of medial UKA. Lateral PFOA has some impact on UKA outcomes, yet patients demonstrate significant improvements in postoperative pain and function. Intraoperative PFOA should not be considered an absolute contraindication for medial UKA. The study's follow-up duration was relatively short, necessitating further research on the mid- to long-term effectiveness of UKA in patients with combined PFOA.

Keywords: Efficacy; Patellofemoral osteoarthritis; Prosthesis; Unicomparment knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Ningde Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Ningde Normal University (Number: NSYKYLL-2023-069). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Consent for publication: Participants in the study consent for publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of postoperative functional scores among the four groups
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of TCPSA among the four groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Tan MWP, et al. Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up after fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. J Arthroplast. 2021;36:1269–76. - PubMed
    1. Wilson HA et al. Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ l352 (2019) 10.1136/bmj.l352 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pandit H, et al. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2011;93–B:622–8. - PubMed
    1. Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals: data from 5,791 cases in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:342–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Effect of Surgical caseload on Revision Rate following total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2016;98:1–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources