Taking a partnership approach to embed physical activity in local policy and practice: a Bradford District case study
- PMID: 39773487
- PMCID: PMC11707940
- DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01704-5
Taking a partnership approach to embed physical activity in local policy and practice: a Bradford District case study
Abstract
Background: Supportive policy is an important component of a whole-systems approach to increasing physical activity and reducing inequalities. There is a growing body of literature surrounding the design and effectiveness of national policy approaches to physical activity, but evidence related to local-level approaches is lacking. The aim of this study was to examine 'what works', and identify factors underpinning change, focused on work to embed physical activity in local policy and practice in Bradford, UK.
Methods: A mixed-methods case study approach involved collecting data from cross-sectoral stakeholders directly or indirectly engaged in the physical activity agenda in Bradford over a period of three years (2021-2024). Data collection included focus groups, semi-structured interviews, researcher observations of key workshops and meetings, and surveys at two time-points (December 2021 and January 2024). Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: Four themes were identified which embody conditions that appear to be critical for working towards physical activity being embedded in local policy & practice within the Bradford District. These included: collaboration and sector integration, co-productive working, governance and leadership, and cultivating a learning culture. The process of co-producing a district-wide strategy for physical activity was key to facilitating shared ownership of the physical activity agenda across different levels of the system, and for supporting and maintaining cross-sectoral collaboration. On average, survey respondents connected with four more local organisations in relation to the physical activity agenda in January 2024 than in December 2021.
Conclusion: Taking a partnership approach, and fostering a culture of evidence-informed decision making, is key to embedding physical activity into policy and practice at a local level. Investing time to understand the aims and values of each partner, and potential synergies and tensions between them, can support the development of a positive and productive collaboration and, subsequently, more effective whole-system delivery and population-level increases in physical activity.
Keywords: Co-production; Collaboration; Mixed-methods; Policy; Sector; Strategy; Whole-system.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study received ethical approval from Leeds Beckett University in March 2020 (ref: 623 69870) and was transferred to and approved by University of Bradford in May 2021 (ref: 624 E888). All participants consented to taking part in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
UK paediatric speech and language therapists' perceptions on the use of telehealth in current and future clinical practice: An application of the APEASE criteria.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1163-1179. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12988. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024. PMID: 38009588
-
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27207731 Free PMC article.
-
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36917094 Free PMC article.
-
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(22):1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40417997 Review.
References
-
- WHO. Global status report on physical activity 2022: executive summary. Pg. 9: 2022. https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/physical-activity/global-stat....
-
- The Lancet. A sporting chance: physical activity as part of everyday life. Lancet. 2021;398(10298):365. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01652-4. Epub 2021 Jul 21. PMID: 34302762. - PubMed
-
- Public health England. Physical inactivity: economic costs to NHS clinical commissioning groups, PHE publications gateway number: 2016:2016055. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/physical-inactivity-economic-....
-
- Scarborough P, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe KK, Allender S, Foster C, Rayner M. The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: an update to 2006-07. J Public Health. 2011;33(4):527–35. 10.1093/pubmed/fdr033. - PubMed
-
- Public health England. (2021) Understanding and addressing inequalities in physical activity (evidence-based guidance for commissioners). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/physical-activity-understandi...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical