Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jan 7:27:e62768.
doi: 10.2196/62768.

The Willingness of Doctors to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems at Different Hospitals in China: Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Survey Data

Zhongguang Yu #  1   2 , Ning Hu #  3 , Qiuyi Zhao  4 , Xiang Hu  5 , Cunbo Jia  6 , Chunyu Zhang  7 , Bing Liu  6 , Yanping Li  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Willingness of Doctors to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems at Different Hospitals in China: Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Survey Data

Zhongguang Yu et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSSs) are pivotal tools for doctors to improve diagnostic and treatment processes, as well as improve the efficiency and quality of health care services. However, not all doctors trust artificial intelligence (AI) technology, and many remain skeptical and unwilling to adopt these systems.

Objective: This study aimed to explore in depth the factors influencing doctors' willingness to adopt AI-CDSSs and assess the causal relationships among these factors to gain a better understanding for promoting the clinical application and widespread implementation of these systems.

Methods: Based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework, we have proposed and designed a framework for doctors' willingness to adopt AI-CDSSs. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey in China and performed fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the willingness of doctors to adopt AI-CDSSs in different types of medical institutions and assess the factors influencing their willingness.

Results: The survey was administered to doctors working in tertiary hospitals and primary/secondary hospitals across China. We received 450 valid responses out of 578 questionnaires distributed, indicating a robust response rate of 77.9%. Our analysis of the influencing factors and adoption pathways revealed that doctors in tertiary hospitals exhibited 6 distinct pathways for AI-CDSS adoption, which were centered on technology-driven pathways, individual-driven pathways, and technology-individual dual-driven pathways. Doctors in primary/secondary hospitals demonstrated 3 adoption pathways, which were centered on technology-individual and organization-individual dual-driven pathways. There were commonalities in the factors influencing adoption across different medical institutions, such as the positive perception of AI technology's utility and individual readiness to try new technologies. There were also variations in the influence of facilitating conditions among doctors at different medical institutions, especially primary/secondary hospitals.

Conclusions: From the perspective of the 6 pathways for doctors at tertiary hospitals and the 3 pathways for doctors at primary/secondary hospitals, performance expectancy and personal innovativeness were 2 indispensable and core conditions in the pathways to achieving favorable willingness to adopt AI-CDSSs.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; clinical decision support systems; fsQCA; fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis; pathways; technology adoption; willingness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis framework of the factors influencing Chinese doctors’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence–driven clinical decision support systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y 221 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osheroff J, Teich J, Levick D, Saldana L, Velasco F, Sittig D, Rogers K, Jenders R. Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer's Guide, Second Edition. New York, NY: HIMSS Publishing; 2012.
    1. Shankar P, Anderson N. Advances in sharing multi-sourced health data on decision support science 2016-2017. Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug 29;27(1):16–24. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641215. http://www.thieme-connect.com/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0038-1641215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. China's health industry development Statistical Bulletin for 2023. National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. 2023. [2024-11-04]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s3585u/202408/6c037610b3a54f6c8535c51584... .
    1. World health statistics 2023: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. p. 119.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources