Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;35(4):578-589.
doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00741-3. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

Sex specificity in associations between exposure to a mixture of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances and anxiety among US adults

Affiliations

Sex specificity in associations between exposure to a mixture of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances and anxiety among US adults

Xiaoguo Hua et al. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Exposure to per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is suggested to interfere with the central nervous system that may affect mental health. Studies on the relationships between exposure to PFAS mixtures and anxiety in humans are rare. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between single and combined exposure to PFAS and anxiety among adults.

Methods: Data were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007-2012). Six serum PFAS concentrations were accessed including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid), PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonate), PFDA (perfluorodecanoic acid), Me-PFOSA-AcOH (2-(N-methylperfluorooctanesulfonamide) acetic acid). The anxiety state was defined through the questionnaire responses of the participants. Weighted logistics regression was used to calculate their odds ratio (OR) and corresponding confidence interval (95% CI) that assessed the relationship between PFAS exposure and anxiety. Moreover, Two different statistical methods including quantile-based g-computation (Qgcomp), and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were employed to investigate the overall effects of PFAS mixtures on anxiety.

Results: The effects of specific PFAS exposure on anxiety varied by sex. In male participants, one-unit increase in PFDA (OR = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.44, 0.88), PFOA (OR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.41, 0.87), PFNA (OR = 0.68; 95%CI: 0.46, 0.96) concentrations were inversely linked to anxiety. In female participants, a one-unit increase in PFOA (OR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.05, 2.14) concentration was associated with anxiety. Analysis of Qgcomp demonstrated that PFAS mixtures were negatively associated with anxiety in males (OR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.74, 0.99), and were positively associated with anxiety in females(OR = 1.16; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.33). Analysis of BKMR suggested that PFAS mixtures were negatively associated with anxiety in the males, while its associations with anxiety were positive in the females.

Impact: Although a growing number of studies have focused on the relationship between PFAS and anxiety, most have been performed based on animal observations rather than human populations, and the combined effects of PFAS mixtures on anxiety have not been evaluated. To address these gaps, this study first explored the associations between individual PFAS and PFAS mixture exposures and anxiety among US adults. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we demonstrated that co-exposure to a mixture of PFAS was negatively associated with anxiety in males, and its association was contrary in females.

Keywords: Anxiety states; Co-exposure; Combined effects; Per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: The application of every technique followed all applicable rules and regulations. The US National Center for Healthcare Statistics (NCHS) granted permission for the 2007–2012 NHANES to be conducted. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Similar articles

References

    1. Charlson F, van Ommeren M, Flaxman A, Cornett J, Whiteford H, Saxena S. New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;394:240–8. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kumar A, Bartoli B, Lichand G, Wolf S. Sociodemographic predictors of depression and anxiety symptomatology among parents in rural Côte d’Ivoire. J Affect Disord. 2023;338:1–9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandy M, Sharpe L, Perry KN. Psychosocial predictors of depression and anxiety in patients with epilepsy: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;140:222–32. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russell JJ, Moskowitz DS, Zuroff DC, Bleau P, Pinard G, Young SN. Anxiety, emotional security and the interpersonal behavior of individuals with social anxiety disorder. Psychol Med. 2011;41:545–54. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kris-Etherton PM, Petersen KS, Hibbeln JR, Hurley D, Kolick V, Peoples S, et al. Nutrition and behavioral health disorders: depression and anxiety. Nutr Rev. 2021;79:247–60. - DOI - PubMed