The development and implementation of a digital platform in a fracture liaison service
- PMID: 39775166
- DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01491-3
The development and implementation of a digital platform in a fracture liaison service
Abstract
The fracture liaison service in the study hospital developed and successfully implemented a digital platform to support the identification of patients while concurrently optimizing participation in the National Fracture Liaison Database. This initiative provides additional evidence of the capacity of digital health to support fracture liaison services.
Purpose: Resourced fracture liaison services (FLSs) are accepted internationally as the preeminent means of reducing the risk of future fragility fractures. The FLS in the study hospital sought to develop and implement a digital platform to support the identification of patients and concurrently effectively participate in the National Fracture Liaison Service Database (FLS-DB) established to monitor key performance indicators (KPIs).
Method: Through linkage with the already established hospital's eTrauma digital system and Inpatient Management System, a bespoke fracture liaison digital platform was developed and introduced. Platform functionality supports automated patient identification and interoperability with the National Fracture Liaison Service Database enabling the anonymized safe transfer of key performance indicator data.
Results: Through automated identification of patients who require fracture liaison services, rates of identification have improved from 10% in 2021 to 87%. Time previously spent manually identifying patients is now available for clinical care. Key performance indicator data are recorded as part of the assessment and treatment process and successfully anonymized and transferred to the national database.
Conclusion: This initiative provides additional evidence of the capacity of digital health to support fracture liaison services. In comparable settings nationally and internationally where there are coexisting digital systems to support patient management and a national digital database for FLS key performance indicators, there is potential for the successful introduction of similar FLS digital platforms.
Keywords: Digital health; Fracture liaison service; Fragility fracture; Key performance indicators.
© 2025. International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: None.
Similar articles
-
A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network.Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1193-1204. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1. Epub 2020 Apr 8. Osteoporos Int. 2020. PMID: 32266437 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of fracture liaison services in osteoporosis.Joint Bone Spine. 2023 Sep;90(5):105574. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105574. Epub 2023 Apr 18. Joint Bone Spine. 2023. PMID: 37080285 Review.
-
Digital integration and sociocultural tailoring in standardized care-FracTurk: the national digital fracture liaison service database by the Turkish Osteoporosis Society.Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Jun 5;20(1):70. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01562-z. Arch Osteoporos. 2025. PMID: 40471500 Review.
-
Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Lille University Hospital's Fracture Liaison Service between January 2016 and January 2018.Osteoporos Int. 2019 Sep;30(9):1779-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05036-0. Epub 2019 Jun 5. Osteoporos Int. 2019. PMID: 31190123
-
How to initiate and develop Fracture Liaison Services (FLS). Recommendations from the IOF Capture the Fracture® FLS Mentors in Brazil.Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Apr 12;17(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01108-7. Arch Osteoporos. 2022. PMID: 35411442 Review.
References
-
- Salari N, Ghasemi H, Mohammadi L, Behzadi MH, Rabieenia E, Shohaimi S et al (2021) The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):609. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Holzmueller CG, Karp S, Zeldow D, Lee DB, Thompson DA (2016) Development of a cloud-based application for the Fracture Liaison Service model of care. Osteoporosis Int 27(2):683–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3260-5 - DOI
-
- Adachi JD, Brown JP, Schemitsch E, Tarride JE, Brown V, Bell AL et al (2021) Fragility fracture identifies patients at imminent risk for subsequent fracture: real-world retrospective database study in Ontario, Canada. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 22(1):224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04051-9 - DOI
-
- Hemmer C, Moore K (2020) Identification of osteoporosis treatment gaps. Int J Ther Rehabil 27(10):1–14 - DOI
-
- Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R, Harrington JT, McKinney RE Jr, McLellan A et al (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res 27(10):2039–2046. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1698 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous