Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;44(3):703-715.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-05030-3. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

Genome-based development and clinical evaluation of a customized LAMP panel to rapidly detect, quantify, and determine antibiotic sensitivity of Escherichia coli in native urine samples from urological patients

Moritz Fritzenwanker #  1   2   3 , Marcel O Grabitz #  1   2   3 , Vera Negwer #  1   2   3 , Oliver Schwengers  4 , Borros Arneth  5 , Trinad Chakraborty  1   3 , Can Imirzalioglu #  6   7 , Florian Wagenlehner #  2   3
Affiliations

Genome-based development and clinical evaluation of a customized LAMP panel to rapidly detect, quantify, and determine antibiotic sensitivity of Escherichia coli in native urine samples from urological patients

Moritz Fritzenwanker et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: We designed and tested a point of care test panel to detect E.coli and antibiotic susceptibility in urine samples from patients at the point of care in the urological department. The aim of this approach is to facilitate choosing an appropriate antibiotic for urinary tract infections (UTI) at first presentation in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance in uropathogens worldwide.

Methods: We analyzed 162 E.coli isolates from samples from a university urological department to determine phenotypic and genotypic resistance data. With this data we created customized LAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) panels for a commercial machine with which to detect and possibly quantify E.coli and six antibiotic resistance determinants. In a second step we tested these panel(s) for diagnostic accuracy on 1596 urine samples and compared with routine microbiological culture.

Results: E.coli was detected with 95.4% sensitivity and 96.1% specificity. Dynamics of the LAMP amplification could be used to gauge bacterial loads in the samples. Antibiotic sensitivity was detected with good negative (sensitive) predictive values: ampicillin 92.8%, ampicillin/sulbactam 96.4%, cefuroxime 92.8%, cefotaxime 97.8%, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 96.5%, ciprofloxacin 96.8%.

Conclusion: The LAMP panel provided E.coli detection and sensitivity information within one hour and thus could principally guide initial antibiotic therapy upon patients presenting with UTI. The panel helps to select initial adequate antibiotic therapy as well as providing diagnostic stewardship. Follow up investigations will expand the test system to other uropathogens.

Keywords: Antibiotic susceptibility testing; Antimicrobial stewardship; Fast microbiology; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification; Point of care testing; Urinary tract infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: Our study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, file number AZ 80/17. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Project strategy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagnostic Workflow: A Urine samples are screened for E. coli with LAMP reactions. Positive samples are then tested for specific resistance genes. B The same urine samples are analyzed in the microbiological laboratory using standard urine culture and phenotypic susceptibility testing
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
LAMP detection of E.coli in vitro, dilution series: E.coli was diluted and measured with LAMP. Higher E.coli concentrations mean that LAMP turns positive faster
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
LAMP amplification curves from point of care testing of urine samples Sensitivity Forecast by LAMP-Panel
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
AMS workflow evaluation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Zeng Z, Zhan J, Zhang K, Chen H, Cheng S (2022) Global, regional, and national burden of urinary tract infections from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. World J Urol 40(3):755–763. 10.1007/s00345-021-03913-0 - PubMed
    1. Peterson J, Kaul S, Khashab M, Fisher A, Kahn JB (2007) Identification and Pretherapy Susceptibility of Pathogens in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or Acute Pyelonephritis enrolled in a clinical study in the United States from November 2004 through April 2006. Clin Ther 29(10):2215–2221. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.10.008 - PubMed
    1. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD et al (2010) Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-aassociated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50(5):625–663. 10.1086/650482 - PubMed
    1. Wagenlehner FME, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Cai T et al (2020) Epidemiology, definition and treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol 17(10):586–600. 10.1038/s41585-020-0362-4 - PubMed
    1. Kranz J, Bartoletti R, Bruyère F et al (2024) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urological infections: Summary of the 2024 guidelines. Eur Urol 86(1):27–41. 10.1016/J.EURURO.2024.03.035 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources