Roughness profile and surface roughness after toothbrushing and degree of conversion of bulk-fill resins
- PMID: 39775417
- DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0128
Roughness profile and surface roughness after toothbrushing and degree of conversion of bulk-fill resins
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess roughness profile and surface roughness after simulated toothbrushing cycles, as well as the degree of conversion (DC) of bulk-fill resin composites at different depths. Forty nine composite discs were made from three low-viscosity bulk-fill resins (Filtek Bulk-Fill Flowable/3M Oral Care - FBF, Beautifil-Bulk Flowable/Shofu Inc. - BBF and Surefill SDR Flow/Dentsply Caulk - SDR), three high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites (Filtek Bulk-Fill Restorative/3M Oral Care - FBR, Beautifil-Bulk Restorative/Shofu Inc. - BBR and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/Ivoclar Vivadent - TEB) and one conventional composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra/3M Oral Care - FSU) (n=7), using addition silicon molds (2 mm thick x 10 mm diameter). The roughness profile (Rv) and surface roughness (Sa) were analyzed after 30,000 brushing cycles using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Five samples (4 mm thick x 2 mm diameter) were produced per resin composite and light-cured for 20 seconds using a LED-curing unit. After 24 hours at 37oC, DC of samples was evaluated at four depths, using a confocal Raman microscope. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey post hoc multiple-comparison tests (α = 0.05). The Rv values of FSU were lower than those obtained for BBR and BBF. The toothbrushing significantly decreased the Sa for all composites. The DC was significantly reduced at 4 mm depth. Toothbrushing changed composite surface of all materials, especially for BBR and BBF. Composites were not able to maintain the DC values shown at the top compared with those at the bottom (4 mm depth).
Similar articles
-
Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites.Braz Oral Res. 2018 Dec 17;32:e122. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0122. Braz Oral Res. 2018. PMID: 30569972
-
In Vitro Evaluation of Surface Properties and Wear Resistance of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites After Brushing With a Dentifrice.Oper Dent. 2019 Nov/Dec;44(6):637-647. doi: 10.2341/18-200-L. Epub 2019 Jan 31. Oper Dent. 2019. PMID: 30702404
-
Effect of Radiant Exposure on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of 10 Flowable and High-viscosity Bulk-fill Resin Composites.Oper Dent. 2024 Mar 1;49(2):136-156. doi: 10.2341/23-025-L. Oper Dent. 2024. PMID: 38349819
-
Effect of tooth brushing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five bulk-fill resin composites.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jan;30(1):59-69. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12350. Epub 2017 Dec 5. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018. PMID: 29205770
-
Curing characteristics of flowable and sculptable bulk-fill composites.Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1201-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1894-0. Epub 2016 Jul 6. Clin Oral Investig. 2017. PMID: 27383375
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous