The Power of Beliefs in Recovery-Oriented Practice: A Brief Report from the STIGMAPRO Survey
- PMID: 39775431
- DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01437-6
The Power of Beliefs in Recovery-Oriented Practice: A Brief Report from the STIGMAPRO Survey
Abstract
Despite the international incentives and the worldwide development of recovery-oriented policies, it has proven challenging to establish recovery-oriented mental health services that take into account users' subjectivity and perspectives (Slade et al., World Psychiatry 13(1):12-20, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20084 ). The objective of this study was to identify individual beliefs that are correlated with six recovery-oriented practices in schizophrenia among mental health professionals. Seven individual beliefs were examined for their association with each of the aforementioned practices: belief in recovery possibilities, biological beliefs, desire for social distance, perceived similarities, professional utility beliefs, continuum beliefs, and categorical beliefs. The results indicated that belief in the possibility of recovery from schizophrenia and professional efficacy beliefs were the most strongly associated with the six recovery-oriented practices examined. Conversely, there was a negative association between stigma score (desire for social distance) and the six recovery-oriented practices. The remaining four beliefs-biological, perceived similarity, categorical, and continuum-were found to be more weakly associated with recovery-oriented practices. In light of these findings, it is evident that mental health professionals' individual beliefs warrant further consideration in research endeavors aimed at fostering and facilitating the implementation of recovery-oriented practices.
Keywords: Recovery; Schizophrenia; Stigmatization.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: There is no potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Part of the solution yet part of the problem: factors of schizophrenia stigma in mental health professionals.Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2023 Jun;27(2):134-144. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2022.2129068. Epub 2022 Oct 6. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2023. PMID: 36200837
-
Perceived provider stigma as a predictor of mental health service users' internalized stigma and disempowerment.Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.036. Epub 2017 Nov 13. Psychiatry Res. 2018. PMID: 29156425 Free PMC article.
-
Continuum beliefs and stigmatising beliefs about mental illness: results from an Asian community survey.BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 5;7(4):e014993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014993. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28381420 Free PMC article.
-
Schizophrenia stigma in mental health professionals and associated factors: A systematic review.Psychiatry Res. 2020 Aug;290:113068. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113068. Epub 2020 May 24. Psychiatry Res. 2020. PMID: 32474069
-
Anti-stigma initiatives for mental health professionals-A systematic literature review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Aug;29(4):512-528. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12840. Epub 2022 May 16. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35500153
References
-
- Ahn, W., Proctor, C. C., & Flanagan, E. H. (2009). Mental health clinicians’ beliefs about the biological, psychological, and environmental bases of mental disorders. Cognitive Science, 33(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01008.x - DOI
-
- Andresen, R., Oades, L., & Caputi, P. (2003). The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: Towards an empirically validated stage model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01234.x - DOI
-
- Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095655 - DOI
-
- Bird, V., Leamy, M., Tew, J., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Slade, M. (2014). Fit for purpose? Validation of a conceptual framework for personal recovery with current mental health consumers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(7), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413520046 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chamberlin, J. (1978). On our own: Patient-controlled alternatives to the mental health system (pp. xvii, 236). McGraw-Hill.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical