Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;35(7):3823-3832.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11231-3. Epub 2025 Jan 2.

Co-occurrence of bronchiectasis, airway wall thickening, and emphysema in Chinese low-dose CT screening

Affiliations

Co-occurrence of bronchiectasis, airway wall thickening, and emphysema in Chinese low-dose CT screening

Zhenhui Nie et al. Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the co-occurrence of incidental CT lung findings (emphysema, bronchiectasis, and airway wall thickening) as well as associated risk factors in low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening in a Chinese urban population.

Methods: Data from 978 participants aged 40-74 years from the Chinese NELCIN-B3 urban population study who underwent LDCT screening were selected. CT scans were reviewed for incidental lung findings: emphysema, bronchiectasis and airway wall thickness. Emphysema was defined in three ways (≥ trace, ≥ mild, or ≥ moderate) depending on severity. Participants were described and stratified by presence or absence of incidental lung findings. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between participant characteristics and CT findings.

Results: Mean age was 61.3 years ± 6.8 and 533 (54.6%) were female. 48% of participants had incidental lung findings: 19.9% had emphysema (≥ mild), 9.2% had bronchiectasis, and 35.7% had airway wall thickening. Among 978 participants, 2.1% showed all three findings. Multivariable analysis showed that higher age (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.08; p < 0.001), male sex (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.14-2.47; p = 0.008) smoking history (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.02-3.03; p = 0.04 for former smokers; OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.59-3.78; p < 0.001 for current smokers), and the presence of respiratory symptoms (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.01-2.00; p = 0.04) were associated with the risk of having at least one incidental lung findings. When different definitions of emphysema were used, the results remained consistent.

Conclusion: In a Chinese urban population undergoing LDCT lung cancer screening, 48% had at least one incidental CT lung finding, which was associated with higher age, male sex, questionnaire-based respiratory symptoms and smoking history.

Key points: Question Reporting of incidental lung findings that indicate lung disease risk lacks consensus in the cancer screening setting and needs evidence of co-occurrence in general populations. Findings Almost half of the 978 participants had at least one incidental lung CT finding; these were associated with older age, male sex, respiratory symptoms, and smoking history. Clinical relevance Incidental lung findings and related risk factors are often observed in low-dose CT lung cancer screening, and careful consideration of their relevance should be given to their inclusion in future screenings.

Keywords: Bronchial diseases; Computed tomography; Emphysema; Incidental findings; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Geertruida H. de Bock. Conflict of interest: All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Statistics and biometry: One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects in this study. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: The study subjects or cohorts have not been previously reported. Methodology: Retrospective Cross-sectional Performed at one institution

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bach PB, Kattan MW, Thornquist MD et al (2003) Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:470–478 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM et al (2021) Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 325:962–970 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Lancaster HL, Heuvelmans MA, Oudkerk M (2022) Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: clinical evidence and implementation research. J Intern Med 292:68–80 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Morgan L, Choi H, Reid M, Khawaja A, Mazzone PJ (2017) Frequency of incidental findings and subsequent evaluation in low-dose computed tomographic scans for lung cancer screening. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14:1450–1456 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Regan EA, Lynch DA, Curran-Everett D et al (2015) Clinical and radiologic disease in smokers with normal spirometry. JAMA Intern Med 175:1539–1549 - PubMed - PMC - DOI

Supplementary concepts