How age and culture impact the neural correlates of memory retrieval
- PMID: 39776064
- PMCID: PMC12066026
- DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01245-1
How age and culture impact the neural correlates of memory retrieval
Abstract
Culture can shape memory, but little research has investigated age effects. The present study examined the neural correlates of memory retrieval for old, new, and similar lures in younger and older Americans and Taiwanese. A total of 207 participants encoded pictures of objects and, during fMRI scanning, completed a surprise object recognition task testing discrimination of similar and new from old items. Results show that age and culture impact discrimination of old from new items. Taiwanese performed worse than Americans, with age effects more pronounced for Taiwanese. The cultural differences in the engagement of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) in younger adults (i.e., greater activity for old [for Taiwanese] or new items [for Americans]) were eliminated with age. The results are interpreted as reflecting cultural differences in orientation to novelty versus familiarity for younger, but not older, adults, with the LIFG supporting interference resolution at retrieval. Support is not as strong for cultural differences in pattern separation processes. Although Americans had higher levels of memory discrimination than Taiwanese, neither cultural nor age differences were found in hippocampal activity, which is surprising given the region's role in pattern separation. The findings suggest ways in which cultural life experiences and concomitant information processing strategies can contribute to consistent effects of age across cultures or contribute to different trajectories with age in terms of memory.
Keywords: Age; Culture; FMRI; Memory specificity; Pattern separation; Retrieval.
© 2025. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Brandeis University Institutional Review Board and NTU Hospital Research Ethics Committee. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Data are presented at the group level rather than for individual participants. Open practices statement: None of the data or materials for the experiments reported here is available, and the experiment was not preregistered.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- R01 AG061886/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- NSTC 112-2321-B-006-013/Taiwan National Science and Technology Council
- T32 GM084907/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- T32-GM084907/National Institute of General Medical Sciences Brain, Body, and Behavior training grant
- NIH R01AG061886/National Institute of Health
- S10OD020039/NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant Program
- T32 GM132498/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- MOST 110-2410-H-002-126/Taiwan National Science and Technology Council
- MOST 107-2410-H-002-124/Taiwan National Science and Technology Council
- S10 OD020039/OD/NIH HHS/United States
- NSTC 111-2321-B-006-008/Taiwan National Science and Technology Council
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
