Neuroimaging Augments DCD-N Score in Predicting Time from Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures to Death Among Potential Organ Donors
- PMID: 39776350
- DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-02204-x
Neuroimaging Augments DCD-N Score in Predicting Time from Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures to Death Among Potential Organ Donors
Abstract
Background: Controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) is feasible only if circulatory arrest occurs soon after withdrawal of life-sustaining measures (WLSM). When organ recovery cannot proceed because this time interval is too long, there are potential negative implications, including perceptions of "secondary loss" for patients' families and significant resource consumption. The DCD-N score is a validated clinical tool for predicting rapid death following WLSM. We hypothesized that neuroimaging evidence of effaced perimesencephalic cisterns improves prediction of time to death compared with the DCD-N score alone.
Methods: In a retrospective population-based cohort study, DCD-N scores were prospectively determined in patients for whom consent for DCD had been obtained. Perimesencephalic cisterns on last available neuroimaging were assessed in duplicate and classified as normal, partially effaced, or completely effaced. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the capacity of DCD-N score and effaced cisterns to predict death within 1, 2, or 3 h of WLSM.
Results: Of 164 consecutive patients, 49 (30%) progressed to death by neurologic criteria and were excluded. Of the remaining 115 patients, 81 (70%) died within 2 h of WLSM. When perimesencephalic cisterns were patent, this occurred in 48% of patients, compared with 88% and 93%, respectively, of patients with partially and completely effaced cisterns (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, the odds ratio for prediction of death within 2 h was 7.2 (2.8-18.3) for each incremental DCD-N score and 15.4 (4.1-58.1) for the presence of either partially or completely effaced cisterns (c = 0.92 vs. 0.75-0.84 for univariate models). Results were comparable for prediction of death within 1 or 3 h. With patent cisterns, median time to death was 132.5 (21-420) minutes, compared with 23.5 (16-32) and 22 (19-30) minutes, respectively, with partially and completely effaced cisterns (p = 0.0002).
Conclusions: Cerebral edema with effaced perimesencephalic cisterns predicts rapid death following WLSM in potential DCD organ donors and improves on performance of the DCD-N score alone. Although originally validated for the prediction of death within 1 h, the DCD-N score remains predictive up to 3 h following WLSM.
Keywords: Cerebral edema; DCD; Donation after circulatory death; Neuroimaging; Organ transplantation; Perimesencephalic cisterns; Tissue and organ procurement; Withdrawal of life-sustaining measures.
© 2025. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval/informed consent: This research adhered to ethical guidelines and received approval from the local institutional review board.
Similar articles
-
Organ donation after death determination by circulatory criteria: family members' experiences with withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in Canadian intensive care units.Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;72(6):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02978-4. Epub 2025 Jun 26. Can J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 40571891 English.
-
Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Donation After Circulatory Death Lung Use.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2460033. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60033. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39960670 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
-
Normothermic and hypothermic machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 9;7(7):CD011671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011671.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38979743 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons of liver transplant from DCD outcomes in high-utilization centers versus low-utilization centers in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Immunol. 2025 May 9;16:1564551. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1564551. eCollection 2025. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40416988 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, et al. Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs. cadaveric renal transplant patients. JAMA. 1993;270:1339.
-
- Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1725–30.
-
- Martin P, DiMartini A, Feng S, et al. Evaluation for liver transplantation in adults: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Hepatology. 2014;59:1144.
-
- Leard LE, Holm AM, Valapour M, et al. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: an update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40:1349.
-
- Kramer AH, Hornby K, Doig CJ, et al. Deceased organ donation potential in Canada: a review of consecutive deaths in Alberta. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66:1347–55.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical