Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 7;16(12):e75264.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.75264. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Exploring Occupational Health Challenges in Pathology: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Indian Pathologists

Rahul Kanungo  1 , Anjali Sharma  1 , Sajal Pagi  1 , Kanika Sachar  1
Affiliations

Exploring Occupational Health Challenges in Pathology: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Indian Pathologists

Rahul Kanungo et al. Cureus. .

Retraction in

Abstract

Introduction Occupational health hazards are a significant concern for pathologists due to their unique work environment. These professionals face risks from prolonged microscope use, exposure to chemicals such as formalin, and handling sharp instruments, leading to issues such as musculoskeletal disorders and needlestick injuries. Addressing these hazards is crucial for their well-being and the overall efficiency of medical diagnostics. Implementing effective safety measures and increasing awareness can create a safer and healthier workplace for pathologists. Objective This study primarily aimed to assess the prevalence of occupational health hazards among Indian pathologists. It further assessed the knowledge and attitudes of pathologists toward safety practices in pathology. Specifically, it explored the research questions: What are the levels of awareness and adherence to safe practices among pathologists? What common factors contribute to reluctance in following these practices, particularly concerning occupational hazards such as musculoskeletal disorders, cut injuries, and chemical exposure? Materials and methods Online and offline versions of a survey questionnaire were prepared to cover the spectrum of occupational hazards regarding musculoskeletal diseases, cut injuries, and level of awareness. The questionnaire was shared through email and social networking platforms with over 1000 pathologists across India. The responses, inputs, and open-ended comments from the respondents were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 146 pathologists responded and completed the survey, starting from residents to professors. Almost all of them had experienced musculoskeletal problems, among which neck pain was the predominant problem, accounting for 82 (56.2%), followed by low back aches, accounting for 69 (47.3%). Needlestick injury was reported by 33 (22.6%) as "at least once in the past year." Cut-related injury while performing grossing/autopsy was reported by 57 (39%), and 29 (19.8%) pathologists sustained this cut-related injury once within the last one year. A total of 26 (17.8%) pathologists had been injured two to five times, and two pathologists (1.3%) had this injury more than five times within last one year. Over half of the respondents, i.e., 90 (61.6%) pathologists, reported eye fatigue symptoms. Additionally, 94 (64.3%) pathologists reported an increase in refractive error after joining the practice, with myopia being the most common, affecting 69 (47.2%) pathologists. Adverse reactions to formalin were reported by 96 (66%) of the 146 respondents. These findings highlight the need for ergonomic interventions and stricter safety protocols in pathology laboratories. Conclusion The study highlights substantial occupational health challenges among Indian pathologists, particularly musculoskeletal issues, needlestick and cut injuries, eye strain, and adverse effects of formalin exposure. These findings emphasize the urgent need for enhanced safety training and compliance with best practices to mitigate health risks, improve occupational well-being, and support the sustainability of pathology practice in India.

Keywords: cut injury; ergonomics; formalin; musculoskeletal; needlestick injury; occupational hazards; pathologist; safety practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethical Committee, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Shri B.M. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre issued approval BLDE(DU)/IEC/401/22-23. The Ethical Committee of this university met on Thursday, 21 April 2022, at 3:30 PM in the Department of Pharmacology to scrutinize the synopsis of research to be conducted by postgraduate student of BLDE (Deemed to be University), Shri B.M. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Vijayapura from ethical clearance point of view. After scrutiny, the following original version of the research project has been accorded ethical clearance: Title: Exploring the Occupational Health Challenges in Pathology: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Indian Pathologists Principal investigator: Dr. Rahul Kanungo Co-investigators: Dr. Anjali Sharma, Dr. Sajal Pagi, Dr. Kanika Sachar. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of respondents according to age groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of respondents according to gender.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of respondents according to different levels of experience at workplace.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Distribution of respondents according to nature of workplace.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Distribution of respondents according to number of work hours per week.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Responses of different participants regarding reporting of injuries at workplace.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Prevalence of the different types of musculoskeletal injuries faced by the participants.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Incidence of needlestick injury among the respondents.
Figure 9
Figure 9. Prevalence of cut-related injury among the respondents.
Figure 10
Figure 10. Prevalence of different types of chronic conditions within the participants.
Figure 11
Figure 11. Prevalence of adverse reactions to formalin exposure among the respondents.
Figure 12
Figure 12. Survey questionnaire first page.
Figure 13
Figure 13. Survey questionnaire second page.
Figure 14
Figure 14. Informed consent form page one.
Figure 15
Figure 15. Informed consent form page two.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pathologist occupational hazards: results of a survey for the French case. Dervaux A, Vaysse B, Doutrellot-Philippon C, Couvreur V, Guilain N, Chatelain D. Ann Pathol. 2020;40:2–11. - PubMed
    1. The dark side of being a pathologist: unravelling the health hazards. Khan S. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2024;67:46–50. - PubMed
    1. Health and safety at necropsy. Burton JL. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:254–260. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The role of the pathologist in environmental medicine and public health. Higginson J. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2032095/ Am J Pathol. 1977;86:460–484. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Design and construction of a biosafety level 3 autopsy laboratory. Nolte KB, Muller TB, Denmark AM, Burstein R, Villalobos YA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021;145:407–414. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources