Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 24:6:1474397.
doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1474397. eCollection 2024.

An Adverse Outcome Pathway for food nanomaterial-induced intestinal barrier disruption

Affiliations

An Adverse Outcome Pathway for food nanomaterial-induced intestinal barrier disruption

Deborah Stanco et al. Front Toxicol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The ingestion of nanomaterials (NMs) may impair the intestinal barrier, but the underlying mechanisms remain evasive, and evidence has not been systematically gathered or produced. A mechanistic-based approach would be instrumental in assessing whether relevant NMs disrupt the intestinal barrier, thereby supporting the NM risk assessment in the food sector.

Methods: In this study, we developed an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) based on biological plausibility and by leveraging information from an existing NM-relevant AOP that leads to hepatic outcomes. We then extracted the current evidence from the literature for a targeted selection of NMs with high relevance to the food sector, namely, ZnO, CuO, FeO, SiO2, and Ag NMs and nanocellulose.

Results: We propose a new AOP (AOP 530) that starts with endocytic lysosomal uptake, leading to lysosomal disruption inducing mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondrial impairments can lead to cell injury/death and disrupt the intestinal barrier. The evidence collected supports that these food-related NMs can be taken up by intestinal cells and indicates that intestinal barrier disruption may occur due to Ag, CuO, and SiO2 NMs, while only few studies support this outcome for FeO and ZnO. Lysosomal disruption and mitochondrial dysfunction are rarely evaluated. For nanocellulose, none of the studies report toxicity-related events.

Conclusion: The collection of existing scientific evidence supporting our AOP linking NM uptake to intestinal barrier impairments allowed us to highlight current evidence gaps and data inconsistencies. These inconsistencies could be associated with the variety of stressors, biological systems, and key event (KE)-related assays used in different studies. This underscores the need for further harmonized methodologies and the production of mechanistic evidence for the safety regulatory assessment of NMs in the food sector.

Keywords: adverse outcome pathway; endocytosis; food; intestinal barrier disruption; nanomaterial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
AOP development strategy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Proposed AOP linking nanomaterial uptake to intestinal barrier disruption based on biological plausibility.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Selection process to identify the relevant publications.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abbott Chalew T. E., Schwab K. J. (2013). Toxicity of commercially available engineered nanoparticles to Caco-2 and SW480 human intestinal epithelial cells. Cell. Biol. Toxicol. 29 (2), 101–116. 10.1007/s10565-013-9241-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdelkhaliq A., van der Zande M., Undas A. K., Peters R. J. B., Bouwmeester H. (2020). Impact of in vitro digestion on gastrointestinal fate and uptake of silver nanoparticles with different surface modifications. Nanotoxicology 14 (1), 111–126. 10.1080/17435390.2019.1675794 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abu-Farsakh S., Wu T., Lalonde A., Sun J., Zhou Z. (2017). High expression of Claudin-2 in esophageal carcinoma and precancerous lesions is significantly associated with the bile salt receptors VDR and TGR5. BMC Gastroenterol. 17 (1), 33. 10.1186/s12876-017-0590-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aleman R. S., Moncada M., Aryana K. J. (2023). Leaky gut and the ingredients that help treat it: a review. Molecules 28, 619. 10.3390/molecules28020619 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anand S., Mande S. S. (2022). Host-microbiome interactions: gut-Liver axis and its connection with other organs. Biofilms Microbiomes 8, 89. 10.1038/s41522-022-00352-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources