Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 25:11:e126.
doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.118. eCollection 2024.

The structure of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis

Hakan Koğar  1 , Esin Yılmaz Koğar  2
Affiliations
Review

The structure of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis

Hakan Koğar et al. Glob Ment Health (Camb). .

Abstract

One of the most popular instruments used to assess perceived social support is the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Although the original structure of the MSPSS was defined to include three specific factors (significant others, friends and family), studies in the literature propose different factor solutions. In this study, we addressed the controversial factor structure of the MSPSS using a meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis approach. For this purpose, we utilized studies in the literature that examined and reported the internal structure of the MSPSS. However, we used summary data from 59 samples of 54 studies (total N = 27,905) after excluding studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. We tested five different models discussed in the literature and found that the fit indices of the correlated 3-factor model and the bifactor model were quite good. Therefore, we also examined both models' factor loadings and omega coefficients. Since there was no sharp difference between the two models and the theoretical structure of the scale was represented by the correlated three factors, we decided that the correlated three-factor model was more appropriate for the internal structure of the MSPSS. We then examined the measurement invariance for this model according to language and sample type (clinical and nonclinical) and found that metric invariance was achieved. As a result, we found that the three-factor structure of the MSPSS was supported in this study.

Keywords: factor structure; measurement invariance; meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis; social support; the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare none.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual representation of all models tested for MSPSS in the literature. Note. G = general factor; FAM = family support; FRI_SO = friends and significant others support; FAM_SO = family and significant others support; SO = significant others support.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Literature search summary.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Akhtar A, Rahman A, Husain M, Chaudhry IB, Duddu V and Husain N (2010) Multidimensional scale of perceived social support: Psychometric properties in a South Asian population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 36(4), 845–851. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01204.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auerswald M and Moshagen M (2019) How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Psychological Methods 24(4), 468. 10.1037/met0000200. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrera M (2000) Social support research in community psychology. In Rappaport J and Seidman E (eds), Handbook of Community Psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 215–245. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_10. - DOI
    1. Başol G (2008) Validity and reliability of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support-revised, with a Turkish sample. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 36(10), 1303–1313. 10.2224/sbp.2008.36.10.1303. - DOI
    1. Bonifay W, Lane SP and Reise SP (2017) Three concerns with applying a bifactor model as a structure of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science 5(1), 184–186. 10.1177/2167702616657069. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources