Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Apr 20;43(12):1453-1462.
doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-02239. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer

Mark M Awad et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade with nivolumab plus ipilimumab improves overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, randomized data for resectable lung cancer are limited. We report results from the exploratory concurrently randomized nivolumab plus ipilimumab and chemotherapy arms of the international phase III CheckMate 816 trial.

Methods: Adults with stage IB-IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition) resectable NSCLC received three cycles of nivolumab once every 2 weeks plus one cycle of ipilimumab or three cycles of chemotherapy (on day 1 or days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle) followed by surgery. Analyses included event-free survival (EFS), OS, pathologic response, surgical outcomes, biomarker analyses, and safety.

Results: A total of 221 patients were concurrently randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 113) or chemotherapy (n = 108). At a median follow-up of 49.2 months, the median EFS was 54.8 months (95% CI, 24.4 to not reached [NR]) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 20.9 months (95% CI, 14.2 to NR) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.15]); 3-year EFS rates were 56% versus 44%. Higher rates of EFS events were initially seen, with later benefit favoring nivolumab plus ipilimumab; 3-year OS rates were 73% versus 61% (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.14]); pathologic complete response rates were 20.4% versus 4.6%, respectively. In the respective arms, 83 (74%) and 82 patients (76%) underwent definitive surgery. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14% and 36% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed potential long-term clinical benefit versus chemotherapy, despite early crossing of EFS curves in the preoperative phase and a lower rate of high-grade toxicity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02998528.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Mark M. Awad

Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Foundation Medicine, Novartis, Gritstone Bio, Mirati Therapeutics, EMD Serono, AstraZeneca, Instil Bio, Regeneron, Janssen, Affini-T Therapeutics, Coherus Biosciences

Research Funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Amgen (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation

Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/1127368

Patrick M. Forde

Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, ITeos Therapeutics, Sanofi, Novartis, G1 Therapeutics, F-Star Biotechnology, Merck, Fosun Pharma, Teva, Synthekine, CureVac, Regeneron, Ascendis Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Novocure, Genelux, BioNTech SE, Tavotek BioTherapeutics

Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Regeneron, BioNTech SE

Nicolas Girard

Employment: AstraZeneca (I)

Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Sanofi, Amgen, Gilead Sciences, BeiGene, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca, Leo Pharma, Ipsen

Research Funding: Roche (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), BMS (Inst), MSDavenir (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen Oncology

Jonathan Spicer

Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb/Medarex, Merck, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Chemocentryx, Novartis, Pfizer

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb/Medarex, AstraZeneca, Merck, Regeneron, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Xenetic Biosciences

Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb/Medarex (Inst), Roche (Inst), CLS-Therapeutics (Inst), Protalix Biotherapeutics (Inst), Merck (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb/Medarex

Shun Lu

Leadership: Innovent Biologics, Inc, Simcere Zaiming Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical

Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hutchison MediPharma, Simcere, Zai Lab, GenomiCare, Yuhan, Roche, Menarini, InventisBio Co Ltd

Speakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Roche, Hansoh Pharma, Hengrui Therapeutics

Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Hutchison MediPharma (Inst), BMS (Inst), Hengrui Therapeutics (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Roche (Inst), Hansoh (Inst), Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co (Inst)

Tetsuya Mitsudomi

Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Lilly, Novartis, MSD K.K, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Amgen, Guardant Health, Ethicon, Thermofisher Scientific Biomarkers, Merck KGaA, Janssen Oncology, Takeda

Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD Oncology, Amgen, Regeneron, Bristol Myers Squibb

Research Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), MSD K.K (Inst), Bridgebio (Inst)

Enriqueta Felip

Consulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Roche, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, Genmab

Speakers' Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Roche, Genentech, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Peervoice, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, Touch Oncology

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche

Other Relationship: Grifols

Uncompensated Relationships: Member of the Scientific Advisory Committee-Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, SEOM (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica), President from 2021-2023, “ETOP IBCSG Partners” Member of the Scientific Committee

Stephen R. Broderick

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca

Scott J. Swanson

Consulting or Advisory Role: Ethicon, Covidien/Medtronic

Julie Brahmer

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen Oncology, Summit Therapeutics, Mestag Therapeutics, RAPT Therapeutics, Genmab

Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst)

Other Relationship: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Regeneron

Keith Kerr

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Regeneron, Takeda, Sanofi, AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Janssen

Speakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, AbbVie, Mirati Therapeutics

Jaclyn Neely

Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol Myers Squibb

David Balli

Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation

Mariano Provencio Pulla

Honoraria: BMS, Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Lilly, Roche, Janssen, Pfizer

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Lilly, Janssen Oncology, Pfizer, Merck, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Gilead Sciences, Guardant Health, Ipsen, Incyte, Bayer

Speakers' Bureau: BMS, Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Lilly, Janssen, Amgen

Research Funding: Pierre Fabre (Inst), Roche (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), MSD (Inst), Takeda (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Amgen (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Takeda, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Pfizer

Other Relationship: Pfizer

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram of patient disposition. aIncludes patients randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy (n = 179) and chemotherapy (n = 105; these patients were not concurrently randomly assigned to the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm and are not included in this analysis) in the revised protocol. bOne patient randomly assigned to the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm incorrectly received chemotherapy (this patient is counted in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm for baseline and efficacy analyses and in the chemotherapy arm for exposure and safety analyses). cIncludes grade 2 pneumonitis, grade 3 pulmonary thromboembolism, and grade 3 diarrhea (n = 1 each). dIncludes refusal of surgery or withdrawal of consent (n = 4 per arm), unresectable tumor (n = 1 per arm), patient who was randomly assigned but never treated (n = 1 per arm), patient who was unfit for surgery (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 2; chemotherapy, n = 5), and patient who achieved a complete response (chemotherapy, n = 1).
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) EFS, (B) pCR, (C) MPR, and (D) EFS in patients with or without a pCR and (E) OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy. EFS per BICR was determined among concurrently randomly assigned patients; patients who received subsequent therapy were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment on or before the date of subsequent therapy. pCR (0% RVT) and MPR (≤10% RVT) postsurgery in both primary tumor (lung) and sampled lymph nodes per BIPR; patients who did not undergo surgery were classified as nonresponders. The OR was calculated using the stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method. aNot computed because of the low number of patients with a pCR (n = 5). BICR, blinded independent central review; BIPR, blinded independent pathologic review; EFS, event-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; MPR, major pathologic response; NR, not reached; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; pCR, pathologic complete response; RVT, residual viable tumor.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Baseline four-gene inflammatory signature score by (A) pCR, (B) MPR, and (C) EFS in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm and (D) EFS in the chemotherapy arm. The four-gene inflammatory signature comprised CD8A, STAT1, LAG3, and CD274 (encoding PD-L1) and was assessed by RNA sequencing of evaluable tumor samples at baseline; scores were grouped as high or low relative to the median z-score across the data set. pCR (0% RVT) and MPR (≤10% RVT) postsurgery in both primary tumor (lung) and sampled lymph nodes per BIPR. EFS was per BICR. Patients who received subsequent therapy were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment on or before the date of subsequent therapy. BICR, blinded independent central review; BIPR, blinded independent pathologic review; EFS, event-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; MPR, major pathologic response; NR, not reached; pCR, pathologic complete response; RVT, residual viable tumor.

References

    1. Forde PM, Spicer J, Lu S, et al. : Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med 386:1973-1985, 2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spicer J, Girard N, Provencio M, et al. : Neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC: 4-year update from CheckMate 816. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024. (suppl 17; abstr LBA8010)
    1. NCCN Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for non-small cell lung cancer. V7.2024. https://www.nccn.org.
    1. Taylor MD, Nagji AS, Bhamidipati CM, et al. : Tumor recurrence after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 93:1813-1820, 2012 - PubMed
    1. Uramoto H, Tanaka F: Recurrence after surgery in patients with NSCLC. Transl Lung Cancer Res 3:242-249, 2014 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data