First pass effect in patients with large core infarcts undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: subgroup analysis of the prospective international ASSIST registry
- PMID: 39778929
- DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022532
First pass effect in patients with large core infarcts undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: subgroup analysis of the prospective international ASSIST registry
Abstract
Background: Studies have described a first pass effect (FPE) where patients with successful recanalization after one pass experience better outcomes. Few studies have evaluated this in patients with large core infarctions.
Objective: To determine whether patients with large core infarcts undergoing mechanical thrombectomy in which first pass reperfusion is achieved experience improved outcomes compared with those who undergo more than one pass.
Methods: The ASSIST Registry, a prospective, global, multicenter registry of patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing mechanical thrombectomy was used. Adults with internal carotid artery/M1/M2 occlusions and preprocedural Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) <6 were included. The variable of interest was number of thrombectomy passes (dichotomized to 1 or >1) performed for the target occlusion. The primary outcome was 90-day good functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-3.
Results: 150 patients with a mean age of 66 years were included. Most patients had ASPECTS of 4 (33%) or 5 (59%). 77 patients (51%) underwent one pass. Compared with patients with one pass, those with more than one pass had significantly lower odds of good functional outcome (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.93; P=0.03). More than one pass was not significantly associated with 90-day mRS score 0-2 (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.43; P=0.17) or mortality (OR=2.03, 95% CI 0.81 to 5.08; P=0.13). FPE (one pass eTICI≥2c) and modified FPE (one pass extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b50) were not significantly associated with 90-day mRS 0-3, mortality, or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Conclusion: This analysis suggests that use of multiple passes is associated with worse outcomes in patients with large core infarcts.
Keywords: Stroke; Thrombectomy.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: AMS reports consulting (paid to self) for RapidAI, Terumo, and Penumbra; research support (paid to institution) from Penumbra, RapidAI, Microvention, Stryker, and Medtronic. LLP is an employee of Stryker and holds Stryker stock. MAM received research grants from Acandis, Balt, Medtronic, Microvention, Phenox, Stryker* (*industry payments are made to the research fund of the institution); receives payment or honoraria for lectures from Balt, Medtronic, Stryker* (*industry payments are made to the research fund of the institution). RG serves as principal investigator (PI) for the ASSIST Registry (Stryker), PI for the RECCLAIM II Study (Zoll), Clinical Events Committee (CEC) for the MIND Trial (Penumbra), Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) Membrane Study (Cerenovus), ELEVATE Study (Medtronic) consultant and stock options for Vesalio, Rapid Medical. All other authors report no disclosures.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources