Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 8:tc-2024-058974.
doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058974. Online ahead of print.

Prospective association of tobacco retailer density and neighbourhood walkability with youth vaping initiation in California, USA

Affiliations

Prospective association of tobacco retailer density and neighbourhood walkability with youth vaping initiation in California, USA

Alyssa F Harlow et al. Tob Control. .

Abstract

Background: Tobacco retailer density might influence youth e-cigarette use due to increased access and exposure to point-of-sale marketing. There is a need for longitudinal investigations on the association of tobacco retailer density with youth e-cigarette use, with consideration of contextual factors such as neighbourhood walkability that could enhance retailer exposure.

Methods: Five semi-annual waves (Fall 2021-Fall 2023) of a Southern California school-based cohort of youth who never vaped at baseline (n=3401; mean baseline age=15 years [range=12-17]) were merged with spatial data on tobacco retailers corresponding to each school year. Time-varying measures of retailer exposures included count of retailers within circular home buffers (800 m/1600 m buffers) and retailer density/km2 within home census tracts. Discrete-time survival analyses estimated associations of time-lagged and time-varying retailer exposures with vaping initiation at each 6-month follow-up, adjusting for race/ethnicity, parental education, neighbourhood walkability and an Area Deprivation Index. Secondary analyses examined moderation by neighbourhood walkability based on a National Walkability Index.

Results: The incident rate of vaping initiation was 3.8% per 6-month follow-up. After covariate adjustment, only associations with census tract retail density were statistically significant (risk ratio (RR) highest vs lowest quartile=1.36, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.84). In moderation analyses, count of retailers within 800 m home buffers was positively associated with vaping initiation for youth who lived in the most walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.16), with no association for youth in less walkable neighbourhoods (RR=1.00, 95% CI:0.95 to 1.05; interaction p-value=0.0238).

Conclusion: Findings highlight the potential role of restricting retailer density in preventing youth vaping, particularly in areas characterised by both greater walkability and tobacco retailer density.

Keywords: Electronic nicotine delivery devices; Environment; Nicotine; Non-cigarette tobacco products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: No, there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of exclusions, censoring, and e-cigarette initiation over follow-up
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Joint association of tobacco retailer exposure and neighborhood walkability with e-cigarette initiation
Forest plot of results from models examining the joint association of tobacco retailer exposure (above vs. below median) and neighborhood walkability (most vs. less walkable) with e-cigarette initiation. Models are adjusted for exposure wave, parental education, race/ethnicity, and Area Deprivation Index deciles. Most walkable defined as ≥75th percentile of national walkability index. Less walkable defined as <75th percentile of national walkability index. See Supplemental Table 6 for corresponding statistics. *Indicates estimates are significantly different from one another (interaction p-value=0.0151); above median vs. below median among most walkable neighborhoods RR=1.70 (95%CI: 1.14–2.53)

Similar articles

References

    1. US Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products. Results from the Annual National Youth Tobacco Survey. Published online June 3, 2024. Accessed June 11, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/youth-and-tobacco/results-annual-na...
    1. Pepper JK, Coats EM, Nonnemaker JM, Loomis BR. How Do Adolescents Get Their E-Cigarettes and Other Electronic Vaping Devices? Am J Health Promot. 2019;33(3):420–429. doi: 10.1177/0890117118790366 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kong G, Morean ME, Cavallo DA, Camenga DR, Krishnan-Sarin S. Sources of electronic cigarette acquisition among adolescents in Connecticut. Tob Regul Sci. 2017;3(1):10–16. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.1.2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cwalina SN, Braymiller JL, Leventhal AM, Unger JB, McConnell R, Barrington-Trimis JL. Prevalence of Young Adult Vaping, Substance Vaped, and Purchase Location Across Five Categories of Vaping Devices. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;23(5):829–835. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa232 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mantey D, Barroso C, Kelder B, Kelder S. Retail Access to E-cigarettes and Frequency of E-cigarette Use in High School Students. Tobacco Regulatory Science. 2019;5:280–290. doi: 10.18001/TRS.5.3.6 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources