Fracture load of feldspar ceramic crowns: effects of surface treatments and aging
- PMID: 39779583
- PMCID: PMC11711631
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-06144-w
Fracture load of feldspar ceramic crowns: effects of surface treatments and aging
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the impact of intaglio surface treatments - airborne particle abrasion and hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching - of feldspar ceramic (FEL) crowns on the fracture load (FL) and to investigate the effects of abutment materials and artificial aging. The aim was to assess whether etching could be replaced by an alternative surface roughening method.
Materials and methods: FEL crowns had their intaglio surfaces either abraded (25 µm Al2O3, 0.1 MPa), etched (HF, 60 s), or untreated and then bonded to CoCrMo- and polymer-abutments. FL was measured for non-aged and aged (1.2 million mastication cycles) specimens. Data were analyzed using, Weibull modulus, two-/one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD-post-hoc-test, t-tests, and TOST equivalence (p < 0.05).
Results: For crowns bonded to CoCrMo abutments, aging affected the FL and Weibull modulus, but pretreatment methods did not. For initial specimens, airborne abraded and etched crowns were equivalent within a 400N bound, however, for aged specimens, equivalence was inconclusive. For crowns bonded to polymer-abutments, pretreatment and aging influenced the FL. Etching decreased the initial FL by over 420N compared to airborne abraded and untreated specimens. After aging, untreated crowns' FL decreased by 528N, while airborne abraded and etched specimens showed no aging effect.
Conclusions: Airborne particle abrasion of FEL crowns' intaglio surfaces did not negatively impact FL and was comparable to etched crowns. Conclusions regarding pretreatment methods and aging differed between CoCrMo- and polymer-abutments.
Clinical relevance: Airborne particle abrasion may be an alternative procedure for the intaglio surface treatment of FEL crowns prior bonding.
Keywords: Airborne particle abrasion; Etching; Feldspar ceramic; Fracture load.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this publication. Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent: For this type of study, formal consent was not required.
Figures







References
-
- Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G (2014) Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement. Clin Oral Investig 18:1975–1984. 10.1007/s00784-013-1173-2 - PubMed
-
- Scholz KJ, Tabenski IM, Vogl V, Cieplik F, Schmalz G, Buchalla W, Hiller KA, Federlin M (2021) Randomized clinical split-mouth study on the performance of CAD/CAM-partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement or a universal adhesive and a conventional resin cement after 39 months. J Dent 115:103837. 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103837 - PubMed
-
- Scherrer D, Bragger U, Ferrari M, Mocker A, Joda T (2020) In-vitro polishing of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations: An evaluation with SEM and confocal profilometry. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 107:103761. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103761 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous