Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Mar;39(3):614-622.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02501-6. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

A novel prognostic risk model for patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia receiving venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents

Affiliations
Observational Study

A novel prognostic risk model for patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia receiving venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents

Rabia Shahswar et al. Leukemia. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Off-label hypomethylating agents and venetoclax (HMA/VEN) are often used for relapsed and refractory (R/R) AML patients. However, predictors of outcome are elusive. The objective of the current retrospective observational multicenter study of 240 adult patients (median age 68.6 years) with R/R AML was to establish a prognostic risk score. Overall response was documented in 106 (44%) patients. With a median follow-up of 31.5 months, 179 deaths were recorded. Median overall survival (mOS) was 7.9 months. In multivariate analysis of the subgroup with molecular information (n = 174), risk factors for inferior survival included the presence of extramedullary disease, HMA pretreatment and mutations in NF1, PTPN11, FLT3, and TP53, whereas mutated SF3B1 was identified as favorable risk factor. These risk factors were subsequently applied to construct an HR-weighted risk model that allocated patients to one of three risk groups with significantly different survival outcomes: favorable (n = 46; mOS 21.4 months), intermediate (n = 75; mOS 7.5 months), and adverse (n = 53; mOS 4.6 months; p < 0.001). The model was validated in 189 AML patients treated with HMA/VEN in first line. This clinical-molecular, 3-tiered venetoclax prognostic risk score (VEN-PRS) for HMA/VEN treatment outcomes in R/R AML patients will support the selection of appropriate treatment options in this high-risk population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MH declares honoraria from Abbvie, Eurocept, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, paid consultancy for Abbvie, Agios, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Glycostem, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, PinotBio, Roche, Tolremo, and research funding to his institution from Abbvie, Agios, Astellas, Bayer Pharma AG, BergenBio, Daiichi Sankyo, Glycostem, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, PinotBio, Roche. RS declares support for meeting attendance from AbbVie. EK declares honoraria and/or travel support from Abbvie, JAZZ, BMS, Otsuka, Servier. WF declares honoraria from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Amgen, Abbvie, Celgene, MorphoSys, Ariad/Incyte, Stemline Therapeutics, Clinigen, Daiichi Sankyo, Otsuka and Servier outside the submitted work; in addition, research support from Apis; patent issued with Amgen; support for medical writing for Amgen, Pfizer, and AbbVie. KSG declares honoraria from BMS and Abbvie. FM declares support for meeting attendance from Servier, AbbVie, Incyte, Gilead, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Teva, Pfizer, and Amgen, support for medical writing from Servier, and Springer Verlag, research support from Apis Technologies, and Daiichi Sankyo, honoraria from Servier, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and AbbVie. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. Ethics approval: The registry was approved by the local Ethics Review Committee (ethical vote No.7972_BO_K_2018). Informed consent: All patients had given written informed consent to the off-label use of venetoclax, genetic analysis and use of clinical data according to the Declaration of Helsinki and institutional guidelines.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Kaplan–Meier estimates for survival for the entire cohort (N = 240).
A Kaplan–Meier estimates for overall survival. B Kaplan–Meier estimates for event-free survival. C Kaplan–Meier estimates for relapse-free survival in CR/CRi patients.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier estimates for overall survival of 174 patients with molecular information according to VEN-PRS classification.
Favorable risk: SOS < 0.25; intermediate risk: 0.25 ≤ SOS ≤ 0.75; adverse risk: SOS > 0.75.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Kaplan–Meier estimates for event-free survival of 174 patients with molecular information according to VEN-PRS classification.
Favorable risk: SEFS < 0.25; intermediate risk: 0.25 ≤ SEFS ≤ 0.75; adverse risk: SEFS > 0.75.

References

    1. Thol F, Döhner H, Ganser A. How I treat refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2024;143:11–20. - PubMed
    1. Thol F, Heuser M. Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Hemasphere. 2021;5:e572. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022;140:1345–77. - PubMed
    1. Ferguson P, Hills RK, Grech A, Betteridge S, Kjeldsen L, Dennis M, et al. An operational definition of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia allowing early identification of patients who may benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2016;101:1351–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roloff GW, Odenike O, Bajel A, Wei AH, Foley N, Uy GL. Contemporary Approach to Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy in 2022. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022;42:1–16. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms