Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 8;14(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02716-9.

Sex and gender in perioperative cardiovascular research: protocol for a scoping review

Affiliations

Sex and gender in perioperative cardiovascular research: protocol for a scoping review

Ana Sjaus et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The inadequate inclusion of sex and gender in medical research has resulted in biased clinical guidance and disparities in knowledge and patient outcomes. Despite efforts by regulatory and funding agencies, opportunities to generate sex-specific knowledge are frequently overlooked. While certain disciplines in cardiovascular medicine have made notable progress, these advances have yet to permeate the literature on perioperative cardiovascular complications in non-cardiac surgery. Prompted by the recent findings on sex-specific perioperative cardiovascular outcomes, this review aims to scope the literature in this field and categorize methodological approaches used to incorporate sex and gender in studies of this patient population.

Methods: Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews will be followed in stages elaborated by Levac (2010). A comprehensive search strategy will be used to identify relevant primary research published since 2010. Screening will be performed by independent reviewers using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data will be extracted from full text and supplementary materials of selected articles. Results will be presented as proportions of studies reporting sex and gender, the assigned purpose of these variables in analysis, and where they are reported in the article. In addition, articles will be mapped to the source, country of origin, and year of publication. Narrative summaries will be provided to outline key findings and assess the depth of the literature within each of the major topics (risk assessment/prediction, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes).

Discussion: Increasing recognition of the profound and complex implications of sex and gender in medicine has fuelled calls for greater attention to participation equity, sex-specific analysis and reporting. Focusing on perioperative cardiovascular complications, this review has the potential to identify knowledge gaps for future research, as well as areas of strength that could support formal knowledge synthesis or secondary analysis of data from past research.

Scoping review registration: Submitted on August 15th, 2023 (Web of Science osf.io/u25sf).

Keywords: Anesthesia; Cardiovascular complications; Gender; Individualized medicine; Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery; Perioperative complications; Perioperative myocardial infarction; Perioperative stroke; Sex differences; Sex specific analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Research ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. The results will be reported in manuscript form and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal as well as presented at anesthesiology and perioperative medicine meetings. Dissemination of major findings through social media academic accounts will be considered. Consent for participation is not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Söderström M. Why researchers excluded women from their trial populations. Lakartidningen. 2001;98(13):1524–8. - PubMed
    1. Holdcroft A. Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine? J R Soc Med. 2007;100(1):2–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merone L, Tsey K, Russell D, Nagle C. Sex inequalities in medical research: a systematic scoping review of the literature. Womens Health Rep. 2022;3(1):49–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bello NA, Bairey Merz CN, Cheng S. A Scientific imperative as seen through a sharpened lens: sex, gender, and the cardiovascular condition. Circ Res. 2022;130(4):433–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weisz D, Gusmano MK, Rodwin VG. Gender and the treatment of heart disease in older persons in the United States, France, and England: a comparative, population-based view of a clinical phenomenon. Gend Med. 2004;1(1):29–40. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources