Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;56(1):41-64.
doi: 10.1111/sifp.12280. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

Exploring Adolescents' Contraceptive Preferences and Trade-Offs: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment in Kenya

Exploring Adolescents' Contraceptive Preferences and Trade-Offs: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment in Kenya

Elizabeth K Harrington et al. Stud Fam Plann. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

A focus on contraceptive preferences is essential to the provision of person-centered care. Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in the WHO African Region experience disparities in contraceptive access and use and reproductive health outcomes. Despite increasing recognition of AGYW needs as unique, their preferences are understudied, limiting strategies to improve contraceptive care access and quality among marginalized youth populations. We designed and conducted a discrete choice experiment among five hundred 15-20-year-old AGYW in Kisumu, Kenya, to examine the relative importance of trade-offs between contraceptive methods and service delivery attributes. Participants answered eight choice sets including three alternatives: two hypothetical contraceptive options characterized by seven attributes (effectiveness, bleeding pattern, duration of use, privacy, access location, counseling source, and cost) and a "no method" opt-out. We used random-parameters logit models to estimate preference weights and trade-offs among alternatives. The bleeding pattern was the most important determinant of stated choice, with a strong preference for unchanged or irregular bleeding over heavier bleeding or amenorrhea. Participants preferred the lowest chance of method failure as well as the longest duration of use (one year) over daily use or use during/after sex. Parous AGYW were more likely to prefer the longest duration of use. The ability to keep method use completely private was also an influential choice, particularly among 15-17-year-olds. AGYW traded effectiveness and increased cost for preferred bleeding patterns and privacy. The opt-out "no method" alternative was chosen only 2.7 percent of the time, indicating a strong preference for pregnancy prevention. Our findings highlight key insights for enhancing the person-centeredness of contraceptive care for AGYW: Kenyan AGYW place a high value on preferred menstrual bleeding patterns, high method effectiveness, longer duration of use, and the ability to keep method use private. Preference data can inform programs, including contraceptive decision-support interventions, to improve AGYW access to quality preference-sensitive contraceptive services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Barnabas Ruanne V, Brown Elizabeth R, Onono Maricianah A, Bukusi Elizabeth A, Njoroge Betty, Winer Rachel L, Galloway Denise A, et al. 2022. “Efficacy of Single-Dose Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Young African Women.” 10.1056/EVIDoa2100056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnabas Ruanne V., Brown Elizabeth R., Onono Maricianah, Bukusi Elizabeth A., Njoroge Betty, Winer Rachel L., Donnell Deborah, et al. 2021. “Single-Dose HPV Vaccination Efficacy among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Kenya (the KEN SHE Study): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Trials 22 (1). 10.1186/s13063-021-05608-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk MPH A, Ganatra B, Moller MPH A-b, Bearak Jonathan, Popinchalk Anna, Ganatra Bela, et al. 2020. “Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion by Income, Region, and the Legal Status of Abortion: Estimates from a Comprehensive Model for 1990–2019.” 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhushan Nivedita L, Ridgeway Kathleen, Luecke Ellen H, Palanee-Phillips Thesla, Montgomery Elizabeth T, and Minnis Alexandra M. 2023. “Synthesis of End-User Research to Inform Future Multipurpose Prevention Technologies in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.” Frontiers in Reproductive Health 5:1156864. 10.3389/frph.2023.1156864. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bridges John F.P., Brett Hauber A, Marshall Deborah, Lloyd Andrew, Prosser Lisa A., Regier Dean A., Reed Johnson F, and Mauskopf Josephine. 2011. “Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - A Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.” Value in Health. 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources