Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan 9;30(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02226-3.

Antihypertensive strategies for the prevention of secondary stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Antihypertensive strategies for the prevention of secondary stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ChunQi Wang et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: Stroke is an important contributor to disability and death globally. Hypertension is a main risk factor for recurrent stroke in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Higher systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure at admission are independently associated with the risk of stroke recurrence. Therefore, lowering blood pressure is recommended by guidelines to prevent the recurrence of stroke.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases was conducted through January 12, 2024. The search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antihypertensive drugs with control measures (placebo or no treatment) or standard blood pressure control (SBPC) with intensive blood pressure control (IBPC) for recurrent stroke prevention. Primary outcomes included overall and subtype stroke recurrence rates, fatal and non-fatal strokes, cardiovascular deaths, and myocardial infarctions (MIs). Secondary outcomes comprised non-fatal MIs and all-cause mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random or fixed-effect models in Stata 15.0.

Results: The analysis included 19 RCTs encompassing 72,048 patients. Twelve studies (n = 53,971) evaluated antihypertensive drugs against placebo or no treatment, while seven studies (n = 18,077) compared SBPC with IBPC. Antihypertensive therapy demonstrated significant risk reductions compared to placebo or no treatment for recurrent stroke (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97), cardiovascular deaths (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97), and MIs (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96). IBPC showed superior outcomes compared to SBPC, with significant reductions in recurrent stroke (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98), cardiovascular deaths (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.91), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.95).

Conclusion: In stroke patients, antihypertensive therapy demonstrates significant protective effects against stroke recurrence, cardiovascular deaths, and MIs compared to placebo or no treatment. Additionally, IBPC provides enhanced protection against stroke recurrence, cardiovascular deaths, and all-cause mortality compared to SBPC.

Keywords: Antihypertensive therapy; Blood pressure management; Hypertension; Meta-analysis; Recurrent stroke; Secondary prevention; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection process and results
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias assessment (1)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk of bias assessment (2)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for A recurrent stroke, B cardiovascular death, C MI, D non-fatal MI, E all-cause mortality between antihypertensive drugs and placebo or no treatment
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Subgroup and regression analysis of antihypertensive therapy vs. control
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of A recurrent stroke, B cardiovascular death, C MI, D all-cause mortality between IBPC and SBPC
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest plot of A recurrent ischemic stroke, B recurrent hemorrhagic stroke between IBPC and SBPC
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Sensitivity analysis of IBPC and SBPC. A recurrent stroke, B all-cause mortality, C MI, D cardiovascular death
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Sensitivity analysis of antihypertensive therapy vs. control. A recurrent stroke, B all-cause mortality, C MI, D cardiovascular death, E non-fatal MI, F MI (exclude Yusuf et al. [17]), G non-fatal MI (exclude PROGRESS [12])

Similar articles

References

    1. Hsu CY, Saver JL, Ovbiagele B, Wu YL, Cheng CY, Lee M. Association between magnitude of differential blood pressure reduction and secondary stroke prevention: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80(5):506–15. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mustanoja S, Putaala J, Gordin D, Tulkki L, Aarnio K, Pirinen J, et al. Acute-phase blood pressure levels correlate with a high risk of recurrent strokes in young-onset ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2016;47(6):1593–8. 10.1161/strokeaha.116.012944. - PubMed
    1. GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:439–58. 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30499-x. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120:439–48. 10.1161/circresaha.116.308413. - PubMed
    1. Medeiros GC, Roy D, Kontos N, Beach SR. Post-stroke depression: a 2020 updated review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020;66:70–80. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.011. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources