Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230213.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0213. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

Intertwined people-nature relations are central to nature-based adaptation to climate change

Affiliations

Intertwined people-nature relations are central to nature-based adaptation to climate change

Bruno Locatelli et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Adaptation to climate change is a social-ecological process: it is not solely a result of natural processes or human decisions but emerges from multiple relations within social systems, within ecological systems and between them. We propose a novel analytical framework to evaluate social-ecological relations in nature-based adaptation, encompassing social (people-people), ecological (nature-nature) and social-ecological (people-nature) relations. Applying this framework to 25 case studies, we analyse the associations among these relations and identify archetypes of social-ecological adaptation. Our findings revealed that adaptation actions with more people-nature relations mobilize more social and ecological relations. We identified four archetypes, with distinct modes of adaptation along a gradient of people-nature interaction scores, summarized as: (i) nature control; (ii) biodiversity-based; (iii) ecosystem services-based; and (iv) integrated approaches. This study contributes to a nuanced understanding of nature-based adaptation, highlighting the importance of integrating diverse relations across social and ecological systems. Our findings offer valuable insights for informing the design and implementation of adaptation strategies and policies.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.

Keywords: archetype; co-production; ecosystem services; framing; pathway; social-ecological system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. IPCC . 2022. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group ii to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. (ed. Pörtner HO). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (10.1017/9781009325844) - DOI
    1. Fontúrbel FE, Nespolo RF, Amico GC, Watson DM. 2021. Climate change can disrupt ecological interactions in mysterious ways: using ecological generalists to forecast community-wide effects. Clim. Change Ecol. 2, 100044. (10.1016/j.ecochg.2021.100044) - DOI
    1. Scheffers BR, et al. . 2016. The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 354, aaf7671. (10.1126/science.aaf7671) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cissé G, et al. . 2022. Health, wellbeing, and the changing structure of communities. In Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (ed. pörtner HO), pp. 1041–1170. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (10.1017/9781009325844.009) - DOI
    1. Fazey I, Gamarra JG, Fischer J, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Christie M. 2010. Adaptation strategies for reducing vulnerability to future environmental change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 414–422. (10.1890/080215) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources