Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Apr;17(4):1067-1074.
doi: 10.1111/os.14354. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

How Accurately Does Bone Mineral Density Predict Bone Strength? A Clinical Observational Study of Osteoporosis Vertebral Compression Fractures in Postmenopausal Women

Affiliations
Observational Study

How Accurately Does Bone Mineral Density Predict Bone Strength? A Clinical Observational Study of Osteoporosis Vertebral Compression Fractures in Postmenopausal Women

Xuemeng Mu et al. Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides incomplete information about bone strength. There are few data on the relationship between osteoporosis-related examinations and bone strength. The objective of the present study was to determine which osteoporosis-related examinations best predicted trabecular bone strength, and to enhance a formula for predicting bone strength on the basis of bone density examination.

Methods: This observational study included postmenopausal women (aged over 50 years) who underwent unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgery in the lumbar spine between September 2021 and June 2023. The pressure within each balloon expansion circle was extracted to reflect the true bone strength. The NHANES 2013-2014 data were used to assess the performance of the formula. The performance of the formula was compared with that of the observed actual fractures. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between the formula and the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score.

Results: A total of 40 postmenopausal women (mean age ± standard deviation, 70.90 years ± 10.30) were enrolled. The average balloon pressure was 59.23 psi (± 12.40, means ± SDs). The mean BMD of total lumbar spine (average of L1-L4) was 0.89 g/cm2 ± 0.20 (mean ± standard), and the Pearson correlation coefficient between lumbar BMD and bone strength was 0.516. After adjusting for age and BMI, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%. Calibration plots of the observed actual fractures versus those estimated via the bone strength formula were considered good fits. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference between the formula and the FRAX score in predicting fracture risk.

Conclusions: After adjustment, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%, indicating a strong correlation. In addition, Bone Strength = DXA × 27 - Age × 0.585-BMI × 0.887 + 98.

Keywords: balloon pressure; bone mineral density (BMD); bone strength; dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA); percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP)surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A, B). Normal (grade 0) to mildly deformed (grade 1) (grade 0: Normal; grade 1: 20%–25% reduction in anterior, middle, and/or posterior height and a reduction of area 10%–20%) (C, D). Intraoperative fluoroscopy of unilateral PKP surgery following standard surgical procedures.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Study flow diagram.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot of included factors.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Calibration plots of the classification model for predicting high fracture risk.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The Bland–Altman analysis for comparing the predictive bone strength and FRAX score. Y‐axis represents (predictive estimated value by bone strength model) − (predictive estimated value by FRAX score). Blue line represents the mean difference, upper red dashed line shows the upper limit of agreement, and lower red dashed line shows the lower limit of agreement. SD, standard deviation.

Similar articles

References

    1. Blake G. M. and Fogelman I., “The Clinical Role of Dual Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry,” European Journal of Radiology 71, no. 3 (2009): 406–414. - PubMed
    1. Cummings S. R., Bates D., and Black D. M., “Clinical Use of Bone Densitometry: Scientific Review,” Journal of the American Medical Association 288, no. 15 (2002): 1889–1897. - PubMed
    1. Khan A. A., Slart R., Ali D. S., et al., “Osteoporotic Fractures: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Significance From the International Working Group on DXA Best Practices,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 99, no. 7 (2024): 1127–1141. - PubMed
    1. Haseltine K. N., Chukir T., Smith P. J., Jacob J. T., Bilezikian J. P., and Farooki A., “Bone Mineral Density: Clinical Relevance and Quantitative Assessment,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine 62, no. 4 (2021): 446–454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Bakker C. M. J., Tseng W. J., Li Y., Zhao H., and Liu X. S., “Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk,” Current Osteoporosis Reports 15, no. 1 (2017): 32–42. - PubMed

Publication types