Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;12(2):1447-1454.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15165. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

Cardiovascular toxicity induced by TKIs in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: Are women and men different?

Affiliations

Cardiovascular toxicity induced by TKIs in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: Are women and men different?

Cristina Madaudo et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: Knowledge of the effects of sex in cardio-oncology is limited, particularly in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). This study aims to evaluate the influence of gender differences on the incidence of cardiovascular toxicity in patients with CML.

Methods: The study population consisted of 148 patients (45% women, mean age: 58 ± 14.2 years) diagnosed with CML treated with TKIs. The HFA-ICOS score estimated cardiovascular risk. The HFA-ICOS score revealed that 12% of men and 6% of women were categorized as very high risk while 45% of men and 50% of women fell into the high-risk group. Myocardial ischaemia, peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary hypertension and new-onset arterial hypertension during treatment with TKIs were recorded.

Results: The incidence of global events between men and women was comparable (35% vs 32%, P = 0.68). There were 33% who experienced a cardiovascular event during TKI therapy, with a significant sex difference in arterial thrombosis incidence (P = 0.02) and venous thrombosis incidence (P = 0.02). Patients treated with ponatinib had a 41% event rate, followed by nilotinib (32%) and imatinib (32%). The HFA-ICOS score demonstrated greater predictive efficacy for events in the female group [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.797] compared with the male group (AUC = 0.537). Very high [hazard ratio (HR) 3.07; confidence interval (CI) 1.11, 8.47 P = 0.03] and high (HR 3.29; CI 1.17, 9.26 P = 0.02) HFA-ICOS scores were associated with increased event risk, particularly in women. Diabetes was women's strongest predictor of events (HR 5.40; CI 1.37, 21.3 P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Our study showed a similar frequency of cardiovascular events between men and women. Accurate cardiovascular risk stratification with HFA-ICOS score in cancer patients is crucial. Diabetes and the HFA-ICOS score were significant predictors of events in the female groups. A sex approach in clinical practice could be pursued to improve the appropriateness of care.

Keywords: BCR‐ABL; cardiovascular toxicity; cardio‐oncology; chronic myeloid leukaemia; gender differences; sex differences; tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description and distribution of events in the study population according to HFA‐ICOS risk score. HFA, Heart Failure Association; ICOS, International Cardio‐Oncology Society.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Description of TKIs used in the sex‐evaluated event group. B, bosutinib; D, dasatinib; I, imatinib; N, nilotinib; P, ponatinib; PH, pulmonary hypertension; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The receiver operating characteristic curves illustrate the performance of the HFA‐ICOS score in predicting cardiovascular toxicity for the general population, male and female groups. AUC, area under the curve; HFA, Heart Failure Association; ICOS, International Cardio‐Oncology Society.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lyon AR, López‐Fernández T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler‐Klein J, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines on cardio‐oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio‐Oncology Society (IC‐OS). Eur Heart J 2022;43:4229‐4361. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac244 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suman S, Pravalika J, Manjula P, Farooq U. Gender and CVD‐ does it really matters? Curr Probl Cardiol 2023;48:101604. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101604 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canale ML, Bisceglia I, Gallucci G, Russo G, Camerini A, Di Fusco SA, et al. Women at heart: introducing gender cardio‐oncology. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;9:974123. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.974123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cesaroni G, Mureddu GF, Agabiti N, Mayer F, Stafoggia M, Forastiere F, et al. Sex differences in factors associated with heart failure and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction: a cross‐sectional population‐based study. BMC Public Health 2021;21:415. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10442-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vera R, Juan‐Vidal O, Safont‐Aguilera MJ, de la Peña FA, Del Alba AG. Sex differences in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of cancer: the rationale for an individualized approach. Clin Transl Oncol Off Publ Fed Span Oncol Soc Natl Cancer Inst Mex 2023;25:2069‐2076. doi:10.1007/s12094-023-03112-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources