Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 10:22:345-353.
doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.10.003. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Interatrial block is an independent risk factor for new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Affiliations

Interatrial block is an independent risk factor for new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Spela Leiler et al. JTCVS Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the association between interatrial conduction block and postoperative atrial fibrillation, which can precipitate acute cardiopulmonary instability and is associated with subsequent heart failure, stroke, and mortality following cardiac surgery.

Methods: Perioperative 12-channel electrocardiograms from 3405 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization, valve surgery, aortic surgery, or combinations thereof, were considered. Clinical and electrographic parameters were compared between patients with and without atrial fibrillation, and significant variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Among 2108 analyzed patients, 764 (36.2%) developed atrial fibrillation. Preoperative interatrial block was a strong independent risk factor (3.18; 95% CI, 2.55, 3.96; P < .001), significantly improving area under the receiver operator characteristics curve from 71.8% to 75.6% (Delong's test: P = .013). Other risk factors included advanced age (1.05; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.07; P < .001), female gender (1.86; 95% CI, 1.45, 2.38; P < .001), history of cardiogenic shock (1.44; 95% CI, 0.99, 2.09; P = .057), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (1.57; 95% CI, 1.06, 2.33; P = .024), cessation of preoperative β-blockers (1.17; 95% CI, 0.95, 1.46; P = .145), score for clinical prediction rules for estimating the risk of stroke in people with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (CHAS2DS2-VASc) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score (0.87; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.97; P = .01) and (1.04; 95% CI, 0.99, 1.11; P = .138), preexisting left bundle branch block (1.59; 95% CI, 0.92, 2.74; P = .097), cardiopulmonary bypass time (1.00; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.00; P = .049), bicaval cannulation (1.45; 95% CI, 0.88, 2.41; P = .035), cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (3.19; 95% CI, 2.45, 4.15; P < .001), and postoperative atrioventricular block (1.20; 95% CI, 0.96, 1.51; P = .105), particularly Mobitz I (6.73; 95% CI, 1.98, 31.51; P = .005).

Conclusions: Perioperative electrocardiogram-derived parameters, especially interatrial block, are associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation. Further research is needed to clarify the link between conduction abnormalities and postoperative atrial fibrillation, enabling targeted prophylactic therapies for high-risk patients.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardiac surgery; electrocardiogram; interatrial block.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
None
Interarterial block is an independent risk factor for new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.
Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow chart displays exclusion process of the patients. AF, Atrial fibrillation; SR, sinus rhythm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interatrial block subtypes according to Bayes de Luna.aVF, Augmented vector foot; ECG, electrocardiogram; PWD, P-wave duration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver under the operating characteristic curve for conventional and interatrial block model. IAB, Interatrial block.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Calibration curves for test and train data sets for conventional and interatrial block (IAB) model with corresponding lollipop bars representing the distribution of the samples.
None

Similar articles

References

    1. Gaudino M., Di Franco A., Rong L.Q., Piccini J., Mack M. Postoperative atrial fibrillation: from mechanisms to treatment. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(12):1020–1039. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres N., et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS):The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qureshi M., Ahmed A., Massie V., Marshall E., Harky A. Determinants of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021;22(2):329–341. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2202040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu S., Che H., Fan Y., Jiang S. Prediction of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation using a simple Nomogram. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02198-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fu W., Green C., Wagner C., et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation in mitral valve surgery is not benign. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;168:1073–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.057. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources