Commentary: Is posterior pericardiotomy dangerous? Not based on evidence
- PMID: 39780818
- PMCID: PMC11704545
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.10.004
Commentary: Is posterior pericardiotomy dangerous? Not based on evidence
Conflict of interest statement
The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment on
- doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.003
References
-
- Rabelo L.G., Zindovic I., Astrom D.O., et al. A posterior pericardial chest tube is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2024;22:244–254.
-
- Gaudino M., Di Franco A., Rong L.Q., et al. Pericardial effusion provoking atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(25):2529–2539. - PubMed
-
- Gaudino M., Sanna T., Ballman K.V., et al. Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an adaptive, single-centre, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10316):2075–2083. - PubMed
-
- Van Gelder I.C., Rienstra M., Bunting K.V., et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J. 2024;2024 - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources