Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 9;28(1):e24.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000035.

Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review

Affiliations

Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review

Cinja Jostock et al. Public Health Nutr. .

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review investigates the characteristics, effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to encourage healthier eating in small, independent restaurants and takeaways.

Design: We searched five databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index) in June 2022. Eligible studies had to measure changes in sales, availability, nutritional quality, portion sizes or dietary intake of interventions targeting customer behaviour or restaurant environments. We evaluated study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results are synthesised narratively, and interventions' impact on personal autonomy is assessed using the Nuffield intervention ladder.

Setting: Small, independent or local restaurants or hot food takeaway outlets, with no restrictions by year or country.

Participants: Anyone selling or purchasing food in intervention settings (e.g. restaurant staff/owners, customers).

Results: We screened 4624 records and included 12 studies describing 13 interventions in 351 businesses. Most studies were of poor quality. Customer-level intervention components mostly operated on the lower rungs of the Nuffield ladder, and most had limited positive effects on increasing demand, measured as sales or orders of healthy options. Whilst rare, most interventions measuring business outcomes operated on higher ladder rungs and showed small positive results. There was insufficient evidence to investigate differences in impact by intervention intrusiveness. Acceptability was greater for interventions that were low-effort, inexpensive and perceived as not negatively impacting on customer satisfaction.

Conclusions: Despite some evidence of small positive effects of healthy eating interventions on healthier purchases or restaurant/hot food takeaway practices, a weak evidence base hinders robust inference.

Keywords: Food environment; Food purchasing; Healthy eating interventions; Hot food takeaways; Restaurants; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram showing the study selection process(24).

Similar articles

References

    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay K et al. (2019) Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 393, 1958–1972. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts SB, Das SK, Suen VMM et al. (2018) Measured energy content of frequently purchased restaurant meals: multi-country cross sectional study. BMJ 363, k4864. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies IG, Blackham T, Jaworowska A et al. (2016) Saturated and trans-fatty acids in UK takeaway food. Int J Food Sci Nutr 67, 217–224. - PubMed
    1. Jaworowska A, Blackham T, Stevenson L et al. (2012) Determination of salt content in hot takeaway meals in the United Kingdom. Appetite 59, 517–522. - PubMed
    1. Nago ES, Lachat CK, Dossa RAM et al. (2014) Association of out-of-home eating with anthropometric changes: a systematic review of prospective studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54, 1103–1116. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources