Effectiveness and safety of talimogene laherparepvec and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Melanoma is an aggressive tumor that is challenging to treat. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), the first oncolytic virus treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat unresectable melanoma, was recently used in recurrent tumors after initial surgery. Our network meta-analysis aimed to compare T-VEC treatment of metastatic melanoma with treatment of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and control group. The protocol for this network meta-analysis was retrospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363321). Three databases, namely Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, were searched until 10 June 2024. The search terms used were a combination of 'metastatic melanoma', 'melanoma', 'T-VEC', 'talimogene laherparepvec', and 'GM-CSF'. Seven studies, with 978 participants receiving T-VEC treatment, 649 participants receiving GM-CSF treatment, and 938 participants constituting the control group, were included in our meta-analysis. For 1-year overall survival (OS), the league table revealed significant differences between the control and T-VEC groups [0.90 (0.83, 0.99)]. The disease-free survival (DFS) over 2 years was also analyzed showing no difference between the groups in DFS in the league table. T-VEC may be a favorable treatment for metastatic melanoma owing to the notable increase in OS. Nevertheless, due to the side effects and limitations, the clinical benefits of T-VEC therapy in metastatic melanoma should be interpreted cautiously. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that T-VEC may be a favorable choice of treatment for metastatic melanoma.