Which items of the movement assessment battery for children are most sensitive for identifying children with probable developmental coordination disorder? Results from a large-scale study
- PMID: 39787776
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104904
Which items of the movement assessment battery for children are most sensitive for identifying children with probable developmental coordination disorder? Results from a large-scale study
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the widespread use of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (MABC-2), little is known about the sensitivity or specificity of the individual items to detect probable Developmental Coordination Disorder (p-DCD). This study examined which specific MABC-2 items were most sensitive to identify children with p-DCD and which items would predict p-DCD.
Methods: Based on a large dataset including European and African children aged 3-16 years (n = 4916, typically developing (TD, 49.6 % boys); n = 822 p-DCD (53.1 % boys), Hedges' g was calculated to establish the standardized mean difference (SMD) between p-DCD/TD. SMDs were considered substantial when absolute values at or above 1.4. Sensitivity and specificity of the raw MABC-2 item scores predicting p-DCD/TD per age band (AB) were established with logistic regression analysis.
Results: AB1: Children with p-DCD performed substantially poorer on threading beads (SMD: -1.61) and jumping on mats (SMD: 1.61). By combining all items and the country of origin, the sensitivity was 61.7 % and specificity 98.6 %. AB2: Walking heel-to-toe forwards (SMD: 1.65) was substantially poorer in p-DCD. By combining all items and the country of origin, the sensitivity was 79.0 % and specificity 97.6 %. AB3: Catching a ball with the preferred (SMD: 1.8) or non-preferred (SMD: 1.61) hand, and for walking heel-to-toe backwards (SMD: 1.78) were substantially poorer in p-DCD. All items combined resulted in a sensitivity of 94.4 % and specificity of 99.6 %.
Conclusion: Not all MABC-2 items are equally sensitive to distinguish between performances of p-DCD and TD. Despite the good specificity, the sensitivity was only moderate in AB1-2, the age at which children learn culturally influenced motor skills.
Keywords: Developmental coordination disorder; Motor competence; Movement assessment battery for children; Sensitivity.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the analyses, interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; nor in the decision to publish the results.
Similar articles
-
Does relative body fat influence the Movement ABC-2 assessment in children with and without developmental coordination disorder?Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Dec;34(12):4433-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 28. Res Dev Disabil. 2013. PMID: 24176262
-
Does the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 at 3 years of age predict developmental coordination disorder at 4.5 years of age in children born very preterm?Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Jan;84:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Res Dev Disabil. 2019. PMID: 29653831
-
Movement assessment battery for children-2: translation, reliability, and validity for Brazilian children.Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Mar;35(3):733-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.028. Epub 2013 Nov 27. Res Dev Disabil. 2014. PMID: 24290814
-
Balance control in individuals with developmental coordination disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Gait Posture. 2021 Jan;83:268-279. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 17. Gait Posture. 2021. PMID: 33227605
-
Field-Based Tests of Strength and Anaerobic Capacity Used in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Systematic Review.Phys Ther. 2020 Sep 28;100(10):1825-1851. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa118. Phys Ther. 2020. PMID: 32949239
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources