Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun;167(6):1667-1683.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.026. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

Demystifying Volume Status: An Ultrasound-Guided Physiologic Framework

Affiliations
Review

Demystifying Volume Status: An Ultrasound-Guided Physiologic Framework

Juliana Yl Kan et al. Chest. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Topic importance: Accurate assessment of a patient's volume status is crucial in many conditions, informing decisions on fluid prescribing, vasoactive agents, and decongestive therapies. Determining a patient's volume status is challenging because of limitations in examination and investigations and the complexities of fluid homeostasis in disease states. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is useful in assessing hemodynamic parameters related to volume status, fluid responsiveness, and fluid tolerance. It requires understanding several physiologic concepts to interpret and integrate POCUS findings accurately into volume-related clinical decision-making.

Review findings: The following concepts serve as a scaffold for a comprehensive volume status assessment: central venous pressure, right-sided heart function, left-sided heart assessment, extravascular volume, and venous congestion. POCUS allows us access to these hemodynamic and structural data points as an extension and refinement of the physical examination. Often, multiple POCUS applications are used, and findings must be integrated with the rest of the clinical evaluation. We illustrate this using 3 common scenarios: hypotension, hypoxia, and acute kidney injury. Clinicians must be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of findings in different physiologic states and the potential pitfalls of image acquisition and interpretation. Further studies are necessary to determine the benefits and clinical outcomes of a POCUS-directed volume status assessment.

Summary: Volume status assessment is ubiquitous, yet is challenging to perform. This review summarizes foundational physiologic concepts relevant to volume status evaluation and highlights how multiorgan POCUS elucidates hemodynamic parameters that can be combined with the conventional clinical assessment to make fluid-related decisions.

Keywords: fluid status; hemodynamics; physiology; point-of-care ultrasound; volume status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph showing normal BPs in the circulatory system when an individual is lying in the supine position. (Reprinted with permission from Guyton and Hall. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 12th ed. Elsevier; 2010:159.)

References

    1. Murray C.M., Abbas Agha S., Rathi S., Germany R.E. The evaluation and monitoring of volume status in congestive heart failure. Congestive Heart Failure. 2008;14(3):135–140. - PubMed
    1. Zhu F., Rosales L., Kotanko P. Techniques for assessing fluids status in patients with kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2016;25(6):473–479. - PubMed
    1. Davenport A., Argawal B., Wright G., et al. Can non-invasive measurements aid clinical assessment of volume in patients with cirrhosis? World J Hepatol. 2013;5(8):433–438. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalantari K., Chang J.N., Ronco C., Rosner M.H. Assessment of intravascular volume status and volume responsiveness in critically ill patients. Kidney Int. 2013;83(6):1017–1028. - PubMed
    1. Kearney D., Reisinger N., Lohani S. Integrative volume status assessment. POCUS J. 2022;7(Kidney):65–77. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms