Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;41(3):441-452.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03324-x. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

Automated stenosis estimation of coronary angiographies using end-to-end learning

Affiliations

Automated stenosis estimation of coronary angiographies using end-to-end learning

Christian Kim Eschen et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

The initial evaluation of stenosis during coronary angiography is typically performed by visual assessment. Visual assessment has limited accuracy compared to fractional flow reserve and quantitative coronary angiography, which are more time-consuming and costly. Applying deep learning might yield a faster and more accurate stenosis assessment. We developed a deep learning model to classify cine loops into left or right coronary artery (LCA/RCA) or "other". Data were obtained by manual annotation. Using these classifications, cine loops before revascularization were identified and curated automatically. Separate deep learning models for LCA and RCA were developed to estimate stenosis using these identified cine loops. From a cohort of 19,414 patients and 332,582 cine loops, we identified cine loops for 13,480 patients for model development and 5056 for internal testing. External testing was conducted using automated identified cine loops from 608 patients. For identification of significant stenosis (visual assessment of diameter stenosis > 70%), our model obtained a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.903 (95% CI: 0.900-0.906) on the internal test. The performance was evaluated on the external test set against visual assessment, 3D quantitative coronary angiography, and fractional flow reserve (≤ 0.80), obtaining ROC AUC values of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.814-0.852), 0.798 (95% CI: 0.741-0.842), and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.743-0.817), respectively. The deep-learning-based stenosis estimation models showed promising results for predicting stenosis. Compared to previous work, our approach demonstrates performance increase, includes all 16 segments, does not exclude revascularized patients, is externally tested, and is simpler using fewer steps.

Keywords: Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Deep learning; Ischemic heart disease; Myocardial infarction; Quantitative coronary angiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: Søren Brunak has ownership in Intomics A/S, Hoba Therapeutics Aps, Novo Nordisk A/S, Lundbeck A/S, Eli Lilly & Co and ALK Abello and has managing board memberships in Proscion A/S and Intomics A/S. Morten Bøttcher declares advisory board work for Astra Zeneca, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Bayer, Pfizer/BMS, Acarix, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interests. Ethical approval: Approval for data access was granted by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics (1708829 "Genetics of cardiovascular disease", ID P-2019-93), The Danish Data Protection Agency (ref: 514-0255/18-3000, 514-0254/18-3000, SUND-2016-50), and by the Danish Patient Safety Authority (3-3013-1731-1, appendix 31-1522-23). All personal identifiers were pseudo-anonymized.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the approach developed for stenosis estimation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of the different data partitions used for model development and testing. The curated dataset for model development included 13,840 patients, which was the union of the LCA and the RCA cine loops for training and validation. The curated internal test set included cine loops from 5056 patients (the union of LCA and RCA cine loops). Similarly, the curated external test set contained cine loops from 608 patients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curve for significant stenosis detection for each segment on the internal test set (visual assessment of diameter stenosis > 70%)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Saliency maps highlighting regions influencing the predictions obtained using Gradient-based Class Activation Maps (Grad-CAM) [31]. The top left image highlights the saliency regions in the cine loop for predicting stenosis in the proximal RCA, where the model predicted 81.6% stenosis, and the cardiologist reported 70%. In the top right image, the model predicted 61.0% stenosis, while the cardiologist reported 80% stenosis in the middle LAD segment. Stenoses were also present in the middle RCA, distal RCA, and left main, however, their corresponding saliency maps are not shown. The two bottom images represent cases with no stenosis

References

    1. Jiangping S et al (2013) Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by coronary angiography: a head-to-head comparison with pathological coronary artery anatomy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 6:262–268. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000205 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neumann FJ et al (2018) ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 40:87–165. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leape LL et al (2000) Effect of variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coronary revascularization procedures. Am Heart J 139:106–113. 10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90316-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee JM et al (2023) Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N Engl J Med 388:1668–1679. 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hwang D, Lee JM, Koo BK (2016) Physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease: focus on fractional flow reserve. Korean J Radiol 17:307–320. 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.307 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms