The combined effects of goal attributes, motivational beliefs, creativity and grit on self-regulation in online ill-structured problem solving: a fsQCA approach
- PMID: 39789628
- PMCID: PMC11720508
- DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02317-0
The combined effects of goal attributes, motivational beliefs, creativity and grit on self-regulation in online ill-structured problem solving: a fsQCA approach
Abstract
Self-regulated learning (SRL) has been regarded as one of the indispensable factors affecting students' academic success in online learning environments. However, the current understanding of the mechanism/causes of SRL in online ill-structured problem-solving remains insufficient. This study, therefore, examines the configural causal effects of goal attributes, motivational beliefs, creativity, and grit on self-regulated learning. With the fuzzy sets approach (fsQCA), the proposed association was analyzed based on a sample of students (n = 88) participating in an educational design competition activity. The results uniquely revealed the predictive factors of SRL at both high and low levels. In addition, it was found that no single condition of factors leads to the prediction of high or low self-regulation. More specifically, different conditions of factors, in terms of gender, goal attributes (goal setting and achievement goals), grit, task value, creativity, and self-efficacy, can largely predict high and low self-regulated learning during ill-structured problem-solving in the context of online learning. Implications for theory and policy prescriptions were discussed to enhance self-regulated learning in online ill-structured problem-solving.
Keywords: Causal factors; Configural approach; Problem-solving; Self-regulated learning; fsQCA.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Smart Learning Institute, Beijing Normal University (No. 2022024) on October 11, 2022. All procedures in this study were in accordance with the institutional research and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Huang RH, Liu DJ, Tlili A, Yang JF, Wang HH. Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak. 2020. https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Handbook-on-Facilitat.... Accessed Mar 2020.
-
- Ge X. Designing learning technologies to support self-regulation during ill-structured problem-solving processes. In: Azevedo R, Aleven V, editors. International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. New York: Springer; 2013;213–28.
-
- Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of self-regulation. Cambridge: Academic; 2000;13–39.
-
- Cho MH, Jonassen D. Development of the human interaction dimension of the self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educ Psychol. 2009;29(1):117–38. 10.1080/01443410802516934
-
- Cho MH, Shen D. Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Educ. 2013;34(3):290–301. 10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous