Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 24;50(8):1583-1589.
doi: 10.1093/ced/llaf013.

Validation of new items for diagnosing primary hyperhidrosis, and estimation of the prevalence of primary hyperhidrosis

Affiliations

Validation of new items for diagnosing primary hyperhidrosis, and estimation of the prevalence of primary hyperhidrosis

Mattias A S Henning et al. Clin Exp Dermatol. .

Abstract

Background: The Multi-Specialty Working Group on the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis has developed evidence-based consensus criteria for diagnosing primary hyperhidrosis (PHH).

Objectives: To validate new questionnaire items for self-reported classification of PHH based on the consensus criteria and to estimate the prevalence of PHH.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Questionnaires containing the index tests and reference tests were distributed to blood donors at blood banks between June and December 2021 in Region Zealand, Denmark. The index tests were the two questions 'Have you had troublesome sweating?' and 'Have you ever had troublesome sweating?', which were used to create six single-item algorithms for classifying PHH. The reference test comprised the consensus criteria.

Results: Overall, 1071 (95.9%) of 1083 eligible blood donors completed the index tests. The reference test classified 59 participants as having PHH and 980 as not having PHH, generating a prevalence of 5.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-7.3]. The algorithms with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity were algorithm 2 with a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.95), and algorithm 5 with a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.80-0.99) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94).

Conclusions: With high diagnostic accuracy, these items allow for the identification of individuals with and without PHH, which may prove useful in epidemiological research. Validation in the general population is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources