Low Vision Rehabilitation Referral Characteristics for Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- PMID: 39791671
- PMCID: PMC11720129
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010064
Low Vision Rehabilitation Referral Characteristics for Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Abstract
Background: Despite evidence that low vision rehabilitation (LVR) services can improve visual function in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), many patients are not directed to access these resources. This study was conducted to determine factors associated with LVR referral and to assess the visual outcomes from completed evaluations. Methods: The study comprised a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of patients with nAMD. Referrals for LVR services were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR). The effectiveness of each evaluation was determined by assessing the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) achieved after distance refraction. Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental costs per-QALY-gained were calculated based upon the better-seeing eye by using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Results: Out of 560 eligible patients with nAMD, 110 were referred for LVR (19.6%). Referral was more common for individuals who qualified as having low vision, based upon the visual acuity of the better-seeing eye (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.214; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.920-5.380, p < 0.001), had bilateral nAMD (aOR, 1.592; 95% CI, 1.017-2.492, p = 0.042), or had commercial health insurance compared to those who had Medicare (aOR, 2.887; 95% CI, 1.041-8.009, p = 0.042). Most patients referred completed LVR appointments (86%). More than half of the patients achieved improved BCVA for their better-seeing eye (53%) yielding an average gain of 0.04 QALYs/patient at a cost of $3504/QALY. The estimated net monetary benefit was $1704 per evaluation completed. Conclusions: Most patients with nAMD achieved improvements in visual function after low vision evaluation, yielding improvements in vision-related quality of life at a reasonable cost.
Keywords: age-related macular degeneration; delivery of healthcare; electronic health record; low vision; quality improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
Author D.J.R. has been involved as a consultant for Beaver-Visitec International, Inc., and has received a speaker honorarium from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) [(accessed on 13 April 2024)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vision-health-data/prevalence-estimates/amd-prevalen....
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Fast Facts of Common Eye Disorders. [(accessed on 13 April 2024)];2020 Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vision-health/data-research/vision-loss-facts/?CDC_A....
-
- Kempen G.I., Ballemans J., Ranchor A.V., van Rens G.H., Zijlstra G.A. The impact of low vision on activities of daily living, symptoms of depression, feelings of anxiety and social support in community-living older adults seeking vision rehabilitation services. Qual. Life Res. 2012;21:1405–1411. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0061-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
