Tailored Approach to Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: Strategies to Facilitate Patient Mobilization
- PMID: 39792281
- DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02152-0
Tailored Approach to Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: Strategies to Facilitate Patient Mobilization
Abstract
Purpose of review: This article discusses a tailored approach to managing cardiogenic shock and temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). We also outline specific mobilization strategies for patients with different tMCS devices and configurations, which can be enabled by this tailored approach to cardiogenic shock management.
Recent findings: Safe and effective mobilization of patients with cardiogenic shock receiving tMCS can be accomplished. Appropriate patient selection, tailored device management, and dynamic multidisciplinary approaches to mobilization are critical to success. Cardiogenic shock is a heterogeneous condition characterized by end-organ dysfunction due to hypoperfusion and low cardiac output. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is an increasingly valuable tool in managing these patients, with various devices and configurations available. Critically ill patients receiving tMCS are at risk for complications and deconditioning associated with prolonged bed rest, making it essential to implement strategies that promote mobility when feasible. We advocate for a tailored approach to the selection and management of tMCS in patients with cardiogenic shock. This approach focuses on the early identification of patients who may benefit from tMCS before further deterioration, alongside the selection of devices that provide ventricular-specific support and facilitate upper-body cannulation to enhance mobilization while also considering patients' potential exit strategies from tMCS. Understanding this approach is vital to appropriately facilitating safe and effective mobilization.
Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; ECMO; Frailty; Impella; Mobilization; Temporary mechanical circulatory support.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with Ethical Standards. Competing Interests: Dr. Wakefield has been a speaker and provided education for Abiomed. All other authors have no relevant disclosures. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Similar articles
-
Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38834162
-
Outcomes with temporary mechanical circulatory support before minimally invasive centrifugal left ventricular assist device.J Card Surg. 2020 Jul;35(7):1539-1547. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14655. Epub 2020 Jun 24. J Card Surg. 2020. PMID: 32579786
-
The New Era of Cardiogenic Shock: Progress in Mechanical Circulatory Support.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020 Dec;17(6):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s11897-020-00490-y. Epub 2020 Sep 16. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020. PMID: 32936410 Review.
-
Pragmatic approach to temporary mechanical circulatory support in acute right ventricular failure.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Nov;43(11):1894-1904. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Jul 24. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024. PMID: 39059594 Review.
-
Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 May 28;13(5):390-397. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae034. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024. PMID: 38502888
References
-
- Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK Stage classification Expert Consensus Update: a review and incorporation of Validation studies: this statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), society of critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of thoracic surgeons (STS) in December 2021. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9):933–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al. Escalating and de-escalating Temporary Mechanical Circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;146(6):e50–68. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(14):1407–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ramzy D, Soltesz E, Anderson M. New Surgical Circulatory Support System outcomes. ASAIO J. 2020;66(7):746–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001194 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Salter BS, Gross CR, Weiner MM, et al. Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices: practical considerations for all stakeholders. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(4):263–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-022-00796-5 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials